Cited by 173Patient Satisfaction in HealthcareMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Management and Opioid Use

Patient Satisfaction With Treatment for Chronic Pain: Predictors and Relationship to Compliance

Hirsh, Adam T, Atchison, James W, Berger, Jerry J, Waxenberg, Lori B, Lafayette-Lucey, Ann, Bulcourf, Bernard B, Robinson, Michael E·2005·The Clinical Journal of Pain

Abstract

Objectives Patient satisfaction with treatment has been extensively researched in a variety of medical patients. However, satisfaction with treatment of chronic pain has received considerably less attention. The present study sought to identify the predictors of patient satisfaction with treatment of chronic pain. In addition, the relationship between patient satisfaction and compliance with treatment recommendations was explored. Methods One hundred eighty patients (84 men and 96 women) seeking treatment of chronic pain at University of Florida pain clinics were recruited for this telephone follow-up study. Results Satisfaction ratings were generally high, with ratings of satisfaction with care significantly higher (t179=9.58, P Discussion Results suggest the importance of distinguishing between satisfaction with care and satisfaction with improvement in assessments. Satisfaction with treatment of chronic pain is not merely a matter of pain relief. To increase the probability of treatment success and satisfaction, attention to the interpersonal aspects of the health care provider-patient relationship appear critical. Explanations for satisfaction's stronger relationship to health care provider-rated compliance were discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ajp.0000113057.92184.90

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hirsh, A. T., Atchison, J. W., Berger, J. J., Waxenberg, L. B., Lafayette-Lucey, A., Bulcourf, B. B., & Robinson, M. E.
Affiliations
University of Florida Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Hirsh, Adam T
  • Waxenberg, Lori B
  • Robinson, Michael E
Venue
The Clinical Journal of Pain
Published
2005-07
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
302-310
ISSN
0749-8047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2021758843
Cited by
173
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Journal of Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
Keywords
patient satisfaction, chronic pain, medication adherence, patient-provider relationship, satisfaction with care, analgesia, predictors of satisfaction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Attitude to Health, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Pain, Pain Measurement, Patient Compliance, Personality Inventory, Probability, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regression Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review