Cited by 12Patient Satisfaction in HealthcarePsychiatric care and mental health servicesAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare

Adolescents Are Less Satisfied with Inpatient Psychiatric Care than Their Parents: Does It Matter?

Madan, Alok, Sharp, Carla, Newlin, Elizabeth, Vanwoerden, Salome, Fowler, J. Christopher·2016·Journal for Healthcare Quality

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patient satisfaction is a commonly used measure of healthcare quality. Limited research exists among psychiatric inpatients, especially adolescents, who pose unique challenges. This study sought to (1) concurrently assess adolescents' and parents' satisfaction with treatment and (2) compare their perspectives' association with treatment outcomes. METHODS: This exploratory study assessed discharged adolescents from a specialty psychiatric hospital. Adolescent patients and parents completed the Perceptions of Care survey (POC), a measure of patient satisfaction. Patients also completed the Youth Self-Report measure, while parents also completed the Child Behavior Checklist-both are used as measures of mental health treatment outcomes. RESULTS: Adolescents and parents gave favorable overall ratings of care. Adolescents were more critical than their parents, and there was little agreement between them. Adolescents' ratings on the POC frequently related to outcomes, whereas parents' ratings rarely did. CONCLUSIONS: Ratings of satisfaction with adolescent healthcare can vary depending on whether patients or caregivers are assessed. The discrepancy between them contains value: adolescents' perception may be a better gauge of treatment outcomes and may affect treatment adherence. Future research should examine adolescent-specific concerns in the context of satisfaction with care and relate them to longer term treatment outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jhq.12081

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Madan, A., Sharp, C., Newlin, E., Vanwoerden, S., & Fowler, J. C.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Houston (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
Venue
Journal for Healthcare Quality
Published
2016-07
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
e19-e28
ISSN
1062-2551 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010558989
Cited by
12
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal for Healthcare Quality (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • McNair Medical Institute
  • Menninger Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Keywords
parental satisfaction, psychiatric inpatient care, adolescents, parents, treatment outcomes, Youth Self-Report, Child Behavior Checklist, medication adherence, quality of care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Parents, Surveys and Questionnaires, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review