The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bitter Receptor Gene (TAS2R38), 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil (PROP) Bitterness and Alcohol Intake
Open accessAbstract
Background: Phenylthiocarbamide (PTC) and 6‐n‐propylthiouracil (PROP), chemically related compounds, are probes for genetic variation in bitter taste, although PROP is safer with less sulfurous odor. Threshold for PROP distinguishes nontasters (increased threshold) from tasters (lower threshold); perceived intensity subdivides tasters into medium tasters (PROP is bitter) and supertasters (PROP is very bitter). Compared with supertasters, nontasters have fewer taste papillae on the anterior tongue (fungiform papillae) and experience less negative (e.g., bitterness) and more positive (eg, sweetness) sensations from alcohol. We determined whether the TAS2R38 gene at 7q36 predicted PROP bitterness, alcohol sensation and use. Methods: Healthy adults (53 women, 31 men; mean age 36 years)—primarily light and moderate drinkers—reported the bitterness of five PROP concentrations (0.032‐3.2 mM) and intensity of 50% ethanol on the general Labeled Magnitude Scale. PROP threshold and density of fungiform papillae were also measured. Subjects had common TAS2R38 gene haplotypes [alanine‐valine‐isoleucine (AVI) and proline‐alanine‐valine (PAV)]. Results: PROP bitterness varied significantly across genotypes with repeated measures ANOVA: 26 AVI/AVI homozygotes tasted less bitterness than either 37 PAV/AVI heterozygotes or 21 PAV/PAV homozygotes. The PAV/PAV group exceeded the PAV/AVI group for bitterness only for the top PROP concentrations. The elevated bitterness was musch less than if we defined the groups using psychophysical criteria. With multiple regression analyses, greater bitterness from 3.2 mM PROP was a significant predictor of greater ethanol intensity and less alcohol intake—effects separate from age and sex. Genotype was a significant predictor of alcohol intake, but not ethanol intensity. With ANOVA, AVI/AVI homozygotes reported higher alcohol use than either PAV/AVI heterozygotes or PAV/PAV homozygotes. When age effects were minimized, PROP bitterness explained more variance in alcohol intake than did the TAS2R38 genotype. Conclusions: These results support taste genetic effects on alcohol intake. PROP bitterness serves as a marker of these effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bufe, B., Breslin, P. A. S., Kuhn, C., Reed, D. R., Tharp, C. D., Slack, J. P., Kim, U.-K., Drayna, D., & Meyerhof, W. (2005) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.01.047 · Cited by 708
Self-citationGenetic and environmental determinants of bitter perception and sweet preferences.
Mennella, J. A., Pepino, M. Y., & Reed, D. R. (2005) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2004-1582 · Cited by 576
Self-citationBachmanov, A. A., & Beauchamp, G. K. (2007) · Annual Review of Nutrition · doi:10.1146/annurev.nutr.26.061505.111329 · Cited by 441
Bitter taste markers explain variability in vegetable sweetness, bitterness, and intake
Dinehart, M. E., Hayes, J. E., Bartoshuk, L. M., Lanier, S. L., & Duffy, V. B. (2006) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.10.018 · Cited by 422
Self-citationGenetic Variation in Taste and Its Influence on Food Selection
Garcia-Bailo, B., Toguri, C., Eny, K. M., & El-Sohemy, A. (2009) · OMICS: A Journal of Integrative Biology · doi:10.1089/omi.2008.0031 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Duffy, V. B., Davidson, A. C., Kidd, J. R., Kidd, K. K., Speed, W. C., Pakstis, A. J., Reed, D. R., Snyder, D. J., & Bartoshuk, L. M.
- Venue
- Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1629-1637
- ISSN
- 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-0277
- OpenAlex
- W2083010381
- Cited by
- 385
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bitter Receptor Gene (TAS2R38), 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil (PROP) Bitterness and Alcohol Intake. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.alc.0000145789.55183.d4
- The paper
- Duffy, V. B., Davidson, A. C., Kidd, J. R., Kidd, K. K., Speed, W. C., Pakstis, A. J., Reed, D. R., Snyder, D. J., & Bartoshuk, L. M. (2004). Bitter Receptor Gene (TAS2R38), 6‐n‐Propylthiouracil (PROP) Bitterness and Alcohol Intake. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000145789.55183.d4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.