Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Binge Drinking, Cognitive Performance and Mood in a Population of Young Social Drinkers

Open access
Townshend, Julia M., Duka, Theodora·2005·Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research

Abstract

Background: Binge drinking may lead to brain damage and have implications for the development of alcohol dependence. The aims of the present study were to determine individual characteristics as well as to compare mood states and cognitive function between binge and nonbinge drinkers and thus further validate the new tool used to identify these populations among social drinkers. Methods: The lowest and the highest 33.3% from a database of 245 social drinkers’ binge scores derived from the Alcohol Use Questionnaire (AUQ) were used as cutoff points to identify nonbinge drinkers and binge drinkers in a further population of 100 young healthy volunteers. Personality characteristics, expectations of the effects of alcohol and current mood were evaluated. Cognitive performance was tested with a Matching to Sample Visual Search task (MTS) and a Spatial Working Memory task (SWM) both from the CANTAB battery, and a Vigilance task from the Gordon Diagnostic System. Results: The binge drinkers had less positive mood than the nonbinge drinkers. In the MTS choice time on an 8‐pattern condition and movement time on an 8‐ and 4‐pattern condition was found to be faster in the binge drinkers compared to nonbinge drinkers. A gender by binge drinking interaction in the SWM and the Gordon Diagnostic System task revealed that female binge drinkers were worse on both these tasks than the female nonbinge drinkers. Conclusions: These results confirm previous findings in binge drinkers and suggest that in a nondependent alcohol‐drinking group, differences can be seen in mood and cognitive performance between those that binge drink and those that do not.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.alc.0000156453.05028.f5

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T.
Venue
Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
317-325
ISSN
  • 0145-6008 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0277
OpenAlex
W2088795865
Cited by
337
References
40
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binge Drinking, Cognitive Performance and Mood in a Population of Young Social Drinkers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.alc.0000156453.05028.f5
The paper
Townshend, J. M., & Duka, T. (2005). Binge Drinking, Cognitive Performance and Mood in a Population of Young Social Drinkers. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.alc.0000156453.05028.f5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.