The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Respiratory Variations in Pulse Oximetry Plethysmographic Waveform Amplitude to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room
Open accessAbstract
Background: Respiratory variations in pulse oximetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude (DeltaPOP) are related to respiratory variations in pulse pressure (DeltaPP) and are sensitive to changes in preload. The authors hypothesized that DeltaPOP can predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients during general anesthesia. Methods: Twenty-five patients referred for cardiac surgery were studied after induction of general anesthesia. Hemodynamic data (cardiac index, central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, DeltaPP, and DeltaPOP) were recorded before and after volume expansion (500 ml hetastarch, 6%). Fluid responsiveness was defined as an increase in cardiac index of 15% or greater. Results: Volume expansion induced changes in cardiac index (2.0+/-0.4 to 2.3+/-0.5 mmHg; P<0.05), DeltaPP (11+/-7 to 6+/-5%; P<0.05), and DeltaPOP (12+/-9 to 7+/-5%; P<0.05). DeltaPOP and DeltaPP were higher in responders than in nonresponders (17+/-8 vs. 6+/-4 and 14+/-7 vs. 6+/-4%, respectively; P<0.05 for both). A DeltaPOP greater than 13% before volume expansion allowed discrimination between responders and nonresponders with 80% sensitivity and 90% specificity. There was a significant relation between DeltaPOP before volume expansion and percent change in cardiac index after volume expansion (r=0.62; P<0.05). Conclusions: DeltaPOP can predict fluid responsiveness noninvasively in mechanically ventilated patients during general anesthesia. This index has potential clinical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The detection of peripheral venous pulsation using the pulse oximeter as a plethysmograph
Shelley, K. H., Dickstein, M., & Shulman, S. M. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Monitoring · doi:10.1007/bf02886699 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Marik, P. E., & Cavallazzi, R. (2013) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e31828a25fd · Cited by 866
Cannesson, M., Le Manach, Y., Hofer, C. K., Goarin, J. P., Lehot, J.-J., Vallet, B., & Tavernier, B. (2011) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e318225b80a · Cited by 554
Self-citationSources and implications of whole-brain fMRI signals in humans
Power, J. D., Plitt, M., Laumann, T. O., & Martin, A. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.09.038 · Cited by 552
Cannesson, M., Pestel, G., Ricks, C., Hoeft, A., & Perel, A. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10364 · Cited by 310
Self-citationAlian, A. A., & Shelley, K. H. (2014) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2014.08.006 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Cannesson, M., Attof, Y., Rosamel, P., Desebbe, O., Joseph, P., Metton, O., Bastien, O., & Lehot, J.-J.
- Venue
- Anesthesiology
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1105-1111
- ISSN
- 0003-3022 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092898593
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Respiratory Variations in Pulse Oximetry Plethysmographic Waveform Amplitude to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.anes.0000267593.72744.20
- The paper
- Cannesson, M., Attof, Y., Rosamel, P., Desebbe, O., Joseph, P., Metton, O., Bastien, O., & Lehot, J.-J. (2007). Respiratory Variations in Pulse Oximetry Plethysmographic Waveform Amplitude to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in the Operating Room. Anesthesiology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.anes.0000267593.72744.20
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.