Risk of Maternal Postpartum Readmission Associated With Mode of Delivery
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether cesarean and operative vaginal deliveries are associated with an increased risk of maternal rehospitalization compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery. METHODS: A population-based cohort study was conducted by using the Canadian Institute for Health Information's Discharge Abstract Database between 1997/1998 and 2000/2001, which included 900,108 women aged 15-44 years with singleton live births (after excluding several selected obstetric conditions). RESULTS: A total of 16,404 women (1.8%) were rehospitalized within 60 days after initial discharge. Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery (rate 1.5%), cesarean delivery was associated with a significantly increased risk of postpartum readmission (rate 2.7%, odds ratio [OR] 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8-1.9); ie, there was 1 excess postpartum readmission per 75 cesarean deliveries. Diagnoses associated with significantly increased risks of readmission after cesarean delivery (compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery) included pelvic injury/wounds (rate 0.86% versus 0.06%, OR 13.4, 95% CI 12.0-15.0), obstetric complications (rate 0.23% versus 0.08%, OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.6-3.5), venous disorders and thromboembolism (rate 0.07% versus 0.03%, OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.1-3.4), and major puerperal infection (rate 0.45% versus 0.27%, OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.6-1.9). Women delivered by forceps or vacuum were also at an increased risk of readmission (rates 2.2% and 1.8% versus 1.5%; OR forceps: 1.4, 95% CI 1.3-1.5; OR vacuum: 1.2, 95% CI 1.2-1.3, respectively). Higher readmission rates after operative vaginal delivery were due to pelvic injury/wounds, genitourinary conditions, obstetric complications, postpartum hemorrhage, and major puerperal infection. CONCLUSION: Compared with spontaneous vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, and operative vaginal delivery increase the risk of maternal postpartum readmission. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II-2.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Cesarean procedures pose postnatal maternal health risks.
“The surgical nature of cesarean procedures also poses postnatal maternal health risks15”
From The relation between cesarean birth and child cognitive development (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Hannah, M. E., Hannah, W. J., Hewson, S. A., HODNETT, E. D., Saigal, S., & Willan, A. R. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3 · Cited by 2,029 · see citing works
Iezzoni, L. I. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.267.16.2197 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Postnatal maternal morbidity: extent, causes, prevention and treatment
Glazener, C. M. A., Abdalla, M., Stroud, P., Templeton, A. A., Russell, I. T., & Naji, S. A. (1995) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1995.tb09132.x · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Association Between Method of Delivery and Maternal Rehospitalization
Lydon‐Rochelle, M. T. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.18.2411 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Wen, S. W., Rusen, I. D., Walker, M., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.022 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Postoperative cesarean section morbidity: A prospective study
Nielsen, T. F., & Hökegård, K. (1983) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(83)90963-8 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Incidence of persistent birth injury in macrosomic infants: Association with mode of delivery
Kolderup, L. B., Laros, R. K., & Musci, T. J. (1997) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(97)70435-6 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Maternal Mortality and Morbidity in Cesarean Section
Petitti, D. B. (1985) · Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-198528040-00009 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Wound infection after cesarean: effect of subcutaneous tissue thickness
Vermillion, S. T. (2000) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00642-0 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Cnattingius, R. (1998) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00244-0 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Planned elective cesarean section: A reasonable choice for some women?
Hannah, M. E. (2004) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.1032002 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Martens, M. G., Kolrud, B. L., FARO, S. F., Maccato, M. L., & Hammill, H. A. (1995) · PubMed · Cited by 97 · see citing works
Liu, S., Heaman, M. I., Kramer, M. S., et al. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.125765 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Self-citationHealth services research: reporting on studies using secondary data sources.
Huston, P., & Naylor, C. D. (1996) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Post-discharge surveillance and infection rates in obstetric patients
Couto, R. C., Pedrosa, T. M. G., Nogueira, J. M., et al. (1998) · International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics · doi:10.1016/s0020-7292(98)00047-2 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21%
Dobson, R. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7319.951/a · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Recent Trends in Caesarean Delivery Rates and Indications for Caesarean Delivery in Canada
Liu, S., Rusen, I. D., Joseph, K. S., Liston, R., Kramer, M. S., Wen, S. W., & Kinch, R. A. H. (2004) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30645-4 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Self-citationVaginal versus cesarean delivery for breech presentation in California: a population-based study
Gilbert, W. M. (2003) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00809-3 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
(2003) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.obstetgynecol.2003.09.030 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Bacteremia shortly after placental separation during cesarean delivery
BOGGESS, K., HEATHERWATTS, D., Hillier, S. L., Krohn, M. A., Benedetti, T. J., & Eschenbach, D. A. (1996) · Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0029-7844(96)00037-3 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Postoperative morbidity following Caesarean delivery
Hillan, E. M. (1995) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03102.x · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Uses and limitations of routine hospital admission/separation records for perinatal surveillance.
Wen, S. W., Liu, S. X., Marcoux, S., et al. (1997) · PubMed · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Self-citationClusters of Acute Appendicitis: Further Evidence for an Infectious Aetiology
Andersson, R. E., Hugander, A., Thulin, A., et al. (1995) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/24.4.829 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Leigh, D. A., Emmanuel, F. X. S., Sedgwick, J., & Dean, R. (1990) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/0195-6701(90)90119-9 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Trends and variations in length of hospital stay for childbirth in Canada.
Wen, S. W., Liu, S., Marcoux, S., & Fowler, D. (1998) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Self-citationLong term maternal health effects of caesarean section.
Hemminki, E. (1991) · Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.45.1.24 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The relation between cesarean birth and child cognitive development
Polidano, C., Zhu, A., & Bornstein, J. C. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-10831-y · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Heaman, M. I., Martens, P. J., Brownell, M. D., Chartier, M. J., Derksen, S. A., & Helewa, M. E. (2019) · Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada · doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.09.006 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Liu, S., Heaman, M., Joseph, K. S., Liston, R. M., Huang, L., Sauve, R., & Kramer, M. S.
- Affiliations
- Public Health Agency of Canada (CA)
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CA)
- Dalhousie University (CA)
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Shiliang
- Huang, Ling
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 105
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 836-842
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2325235714
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 26
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
- Keywords
- cesarean section, instrumental delivery, mode of delivery, normal delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum infection, pelvic trauma, pregnancy complications, venous thromboembolism, forceps delivery, vacuum extraction, hospital readmission risk factors, singleton live births
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Cesarean Section, Female, Humans, Patient Discharge, Patient Readmission, Pregnancy, Puerperal Disorders, Risk Factors, Databases, Factual, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Delivery, Obstetric
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review