The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measures of Working Memory Span and Verbal Rehearsal Speed in Deaf Children after Cochlear Implantation
Open accessAbstract
In Brief Large individual differences in spoken word recognition performance have been found in deaf children after cochlear implantation. Recently, Pisoni and Geers (2000) reported that simple forward digit span measures of verbal working memory were significantly correlated with spoken word recognition scores even after potentially confounding variables were statistically controlled for. The present study replicates and extends these initial findings to the full set of 176 participants in the CID cochlear implant study. The pooled data indicate that despite statistical “partialling-out” of differences in chronological age, communication mode, duration of deafness, duration of device use, age at onset of deafness, number of active electrodes, and speech feature discrimination, significant correlations still remain between digit span and several measures of spoken word recognition. Strong correlations were also observed between speaking rate and both forward and backward digit span, a result that is similar to previously reported findings in normal-hearing adults and children. The results suggest that perhaps as much as 20% of the currently unexplained variance in spoken word recognition scores may be independently accounted for by individual differences in cognitive factors related to the speed and efficiency with which phonological and lexical representations of spoken words are maintained in and retrieved from working memory. A smaller percentage, perhaps about 7% of the currently unexplained variance in spoken word recognition scores, may be accounted for in terms of working memory capacity. We discuss how these relationships may arise and their contribution to subsequent speech and language development in prelingually deaf children who use cochlear implants. Although previous articles in this supplement have examined child, family, implant, and educational variables that account for significant variance in outcome, these factors account for only about half of the total variance. These authors maintain that to explain further variance we must focus on the underlying cognitive information processing skills that are used to support the perception and production of spoken language. Estimates of working memory capacity and articulation rate were obtained for 176 children with cochlear implants using the digit span scores from the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children and speaking rate measurements from productions of the McGarr sentences. Results indicate that a substantial portion of the currently unexplained variance may be independently accounted for by individual differences in working memory capacity and other cognitive factors related to the speed and efficiency with which phonological and lexical representations of spoken words are maintained in and retrieved from working memory.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The phonological loop as a language learning device.
Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Papagno, C. (1998) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.105.1.158 · Cited by 2,199
How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise.
Pichora-Fuller, M. K., Schneider, B. A., & Daneman, M. (1995) · The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · doi:10.1121/1.412282 · Cited by 1,089
Spontaneous verbal rehearsal in a memory task as a function of age
Flavell, J. H., Beach, D. R., & Chinsky, J. M. (1966) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1126804 · Cited by 622
The emergence of the word length effect in young children: The effects of overt and covert rehearsal
Johnston, R. S., Johnson, C., & Gray, C. (1987) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1987.tb01059.x · Cited by 42
Cited by
Predictors of Reading Skill Development in Children with Early Cochlear Implantation
Geers, A. E. (2003) · Ear and Hearing · doi:10.1097/01.aud.0000051690.43989.5d · Cited by 361
Eisner, F., McGettigan, C., Faulkner, A., Rosen, S., & Scott, S. K. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4040-09.2010 · Cited by 108
A comparison of deaf and hearing children's reading comprehension profiles
Kyle, F. E., & Cain, K. (2015) · Topics in Language Disorders · doi:10.1097/tld.0000000000000053 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Pisoni, D. B., & Cleary, M.
- Venue
- Ear and Hearing
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- 106S-120S
- ISSN
- 0196-0202 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1993378867
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Measures of Working Memory Span and Verbal Rehearsal Speed in Deaf Children after Cochlear Implantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.aud.0000051692.05140.8e
- The paper
- Pisoni, D. B., & Cleary, M. (2003). Measures of Working Memory Span and Verbal Rehearsal Speed in Deaf Children after Cochlear Implantation. Ear and Hearing. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aud.0000051692.05140.8e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.