Cited by 148Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyPregnancy-related medical research

Early Intervention for the Management of Acute Low Back Pain: A Single-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Biopsychosocial Education, Manual Therapy, and Exercise

Wand, Benedict M., Bird, Christien, McAuley, James H., Doré, Caroline J., MacDowell, Maureen, De Souza, Lorraine H.·2004·Spine

Abstract

Study design A single blind randomized controlled trial comparing two models of care for patients with acute simple low back pain. Objectives To compare two research-based models of care for acute low back pain and investigate the effect of the timing of physical intervention. Summary of background data National guidelines offer conflicting information on the delivery of physical treatment in the management of acute low back pain. The guidelines suggest two different models of care. Direct comparisons between these models are lacking in the literature. The present study aims to compare these approaches to the management of acute low back pain. Methods Among 804 referred patients, 102 subjects met the specific admission criteria and were randomly assigned to an "assess/advise/treat" group or an "assess/advise/wait" group. The intervention consisted of biopsychosocial education, manual therapy, and exercise. Assessment of short-term outcome enables comparison to be made between intervention and advice to stay active. Assessment of long-term outcome enables comparison to be made between early and late intervention. Study outcomes of reported pain (Visual Analogue Scale), functional disability (the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire), mood (Modified Zung Self Rated Depression Score, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory), general health (Euroqol), and quality of life (Short Form 36) were assessed at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 mon…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000143619.34308.b4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wand, B. M., Bird, C., McAuley, J. H., Doré, C. J., MacDowell, M., & De Souza, L. H.
Affiliations
  • The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
  • Central Middlesex Hospital (GB)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL (GB)
Corresponding author
Wand, Benedict M.
Venue
Spine
Published
2004-11
Volume
29
Issue
21
Pages
2350-2356
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167865926
Cited by
148
References
31
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Spine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy-related medical research
Keywords
acute low back pain, early intervention, models of care, manual therapy, exercise therapy, treatment timing, functional disability, pain, mood, quality of life, psychosocial outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Exercise Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Models, Theoretical, Motor Activity, Pain Measurement, Patient Education as Topic, Psychology, Quality of Life, Teaching Materials, Time Factors, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Low Back Pain, Manipulation, Spinal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review