The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Collagen Matrix (DuraGen) in Dural Repair: Analysis of a New Modified Technique
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of 110 patients undergoing spinal dural repair and regeneration using an onlay, suture-free, 3-dimensional-collagen matrix graft (DuraGen) over an 8-year period (1995-2003). OBJECTIVES: Technique appraisal of collagen matrix to repair spinal dura following incidental durotomy, spinal tumor surgery, and trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Traditional methods of spinal dural repair following incidental durotomy involve tedious attempts at primary watertight suture with a 5% to 10% failure rate. Dural injury occurs after trauma, or dural excision may be required after tumor resection. Collagen matrix is a newer development in collagen sponge. METHODS: The clinical and demographic data included diagnosis, type and site of surgery, infection risk, size of defect, use of lumbar drains, closed suction subfascial drains, and adverse events. The primary endpoints of graft failure were cerebrospinal fluid leak and pseudomeningocele formation. Neurosurgical wound infection rates were determined. RESULTS: Collagen matrix was used (n = 110) in the following conditions: degenerative (69), pseudomeningocele formation repair (4), tumors (14), trauma (13), and congenital (5). There were 15 cervical (10 anterior), 21 thoracic (3 anterior), and 71 lumbar (all posterior) surgeries. Fibrin glue was used in 7.3%, subfascial drains in 82%, and lumbar drainage in 2.7%. Overall, cerebrospinal fluid leaks occurred in 2.7%. The 2 pseudomeningocele formations (3.2%) resolved at 3 months. There were 2 wound infections. In the subgroup with incidental durotomy (n = 69), failure of cerebrospinal fluid containment occurred in 4.3% [1 cerebrospinal fluid leak (1.4%), 2 pseudomeningocele formations (2.9%)]. CONCLUSIONS: Collagen matrix was successful in cerebrospinal fluid containment in > 95% of patients requiring dural repair following anterior and posterior spinal surgery. Subfascial drains were safe. Routine lumbar drains are not required but are recommended for repair of established pseudomeningocele formations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials
Nair, L. S., & Laurencin, C. T. (2007) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017 · Cited by 4,416
Current development of biodegradable polymeric materials for biomedical applications
Song, R., Murphy, M., Li, C., Ting, K., Soo, C., & Zheng, Z. (2018) · Drug Design, Development and Therapy · doi:10.2147/dddt.s165440 · Cited by 915
Elastomeric biomaterials for tissue engineering
Chen, Q., Liang, S., & Thouas, G. A. (2013) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.05.003 · Cited by 564
Collagen—emerging collagen based therapies hit the patient
Abou Neel, E. A., Bozec, L., Knowles, J. C., Syed, O., Mudera, V., Day, R., & Hyun, J. K. (2013) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.08.010 · Cited by 296
Advancement of Biomaterial-Based Postoperative Adhesion Barriers
Chandel, A. K. S., Shimizu, A., Hasegawa, K., & Ito, T. (2021) · Macromolecular Bioscience · doi:10.1002/mabi.202000395 · Cited by 138
Metadata
- Authors
- Narotam, P. K., José, S., Nathoo, N., Taylon, C., & Vora, Y.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2004-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 24
- Pages
- 2861-2867
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025550694
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Collagen Matrix (DuraGen) in Dural Repair: Analysis of a New Modified Technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000148049.69541.ad
- The paper
- Narotam, P. K., José, S., Nathoo, N., Taylon, C., & Vora, Y. (2004). Collagen Matrix (DuraGen) in Dural Repair: Analysis of a New Modified Technique. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000148049.69541.ad
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.