Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Intervariability and Intravariability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Products

Bae, Hyun W., Zhao, Li, Kanim, Linda E. A., Wong, Pamela, Delamarter, Rick B., Dawson, Edgar G.·2006·Spine

Abstract

In Brief Study Design. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) 2, 4, and 7 in 9 commercially available (“off the shelf”) demineralized bone matrix (DBM) product formulations using 3 different manufacturer’s production lots of each DBM formulation. Objectives. To evaluate and compare the quantity of BMPs among several different DBM formulations (inter-product variability), as well as examine the variability of these proteins in different production lots within the same DBM formulation (intra-product variability). Summary of Background Data. DBMs are commonly used to augment available bone graft in spinal fusion procedures. Surgeons are presented with an ever-increasing variety of commercially available human DBMs from which to choose. Yet, there is limited information on a specific DBM product’s osteoinductive efficacy, potency, and constancy. Methods. There were protein extracts from each DBM sample separately dialyzed 4 times against distilled water at 4°C for 48 hours. The amount of BMP-2, BMP-4, and BMP-7 was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results. The concentrations of detected BMP-2 and BMP-7 were low for all DBM formulations, only nanograms of BMP were extracted from each gram of DBM (20.2–120.6 ng BMP-2/ g DBM product; 54.2–226.8 ng BMP-7/ g DBM). The variability of BMP concentrations among different lots of the same DBM formulation, intra-product variability, was higher than the variability of concentrations among different DBM formulations, inter-product variability (coefficient of variation range BMP-2 [16.34% to 76.01%], P < 0.01; BMP-7 [3.71% to 82.08%], P < 0.001). BMP-4 was undetectable. Conclusions. The relative quantities of BMPs in DBMs are low, in the order of 1 × 10−9 g of BMP/g of DBM. There is higher variability in concentration of BMPs among 3 different lots of the same DBM formulation than among different DBM formulations. This variability questions DBM products’ reliability and, possibly, efficacy in providing consistent osteoinduction. The concentrations of bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) 2, 4, and 7 were assayed in commercially available demineralized bone matrix (DBM) products. BMP-2 and BMP-7 were detected, while BMP-4 was not detected using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. There was higher variability in the concentration of BMPs between different production lots of the same formulation (intra-product variability) than among different DBM products (inter-product variability). In previous animal and human clinical studies, this lot-to-lot variability was not recognized. Each tested DBM product was assumed to be identical in quality to the next, as long as its product name was identical. This intra-product variability may explain the inconsistent results in previous animal studies and should be considered in future studies evaluating DBM products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.brs.0000218581.92992.b7

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Bae, H. W., Zhao, L., Kanim, L. E. A., Wong, P., Delamarter, R. B., & Dawson, E. G.
Venue
Spine
Published
2006-05
Volume
31
Issue
12
Pages
1299-1306
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1991380557
Cited by
158
References
0
FWCI
4.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intervariability and Intravariability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000218581.92992.b7
The paper
Bae, H. W., Zhao, L., Kanim, L. E. A., Wong, P., Delamarter, R. B., & Dawson, E. G. (2006). Intervariability and Intravariability of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins in Commercially Available Demineralized Bone Matrix Products. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000218581.92992.b7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.