The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of Different Upright Sitting Postures on Spinal-Pelvic Curvature and Trunk Muscle Activation in a Pain-Free Population
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. A normative within-subjects single-group study. Objective. To compare spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation in 2 upright sitting postures (“thoracic” and “lumbo-pelvic”) and slump sitting in a pain-free population. Summary of Background Data. Clinical observations suggest that both upright and slump sitting postures can exacerbate low back pain. Little research has investigated the effects of different upright sitting postures on trunk muscle activation. Methods. Spinal-pelvic curvature and surface electromyography of 6 trunk muscles were measured bilaterally in 2 upright (thoracic and lumbo-pelvic) sitting postures and slump sitting in 22 subjects. Results. Thoracic, compared to lumbo-pelvic, upright sitting showed significantly greater thoracic extension (P < 0.001), with significantly less lumbar extension (P < 0.001) and anterior pelvic tilt (P = 0.03). Furthermore, there was significantly less superficial lumbar multifidus (P < 0.001) and internal oblique (P = 0.03) activity, with significantly higher thoracic erector spinae (P < 0.001) and external oblique (P = 0.04) activity in thoracic upright sitting. There was no significant difference in superficial lumbar multifidus activity between thoracic upright and slump sitting. Conclusions. Different upright sitting postures resulted in altered trunk muscle activation. Thoracic when compared to lumbo-pelvic upright sitting involved less coactivation of the local spinal muscles, with greater coactivation of the global muscles. These results highlight the importance of postural training specificity when the aim is to activate the lumbo-pelvic stabilizing muscles in subjects with back pain. Spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation were measured in 2 upright sitting postures and slump sitting. Thoracic upright, compared to lumbo-pelvic upright, sitting involved less activation of the lumbo-pelvic stabilizing muscles, with greater activation of the global stabilizers. Different upright sitting postures resulted in altered trunk muscle activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stability of the lumbar spine: A study in mechanical engineering
Bergmark, A. (1989) · Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica · doi:10.3109/17453678909154177 · Cited by 1,179
Coordination of muscle activity to assure stability of the lumbar spine
McGill, S. M., Grenier, S., Kavcic, N., & Cholewicki, J. (2003) · Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology · doi:10.1016/s1050-6411(03)00043-9 · Cited by 590
Stability Increase of the Lumbar Spine With Different Muscle Groups: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study
Wilke, H.-J., Wolf, S., Claes, L. E., Arand, M., & Wiesend, A. (1995) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199501150-00011 · Cited by 557
A Guide for Use and Interpretation of Kinesiologic Electromyographic Data
Soderberg, G. L., & Knutson, L. M. (2000) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.1093/ptj/80.5.485 · Cited by 538
O'Sullivan, P. B. (2000) · Manual Therapy · doi:10.1054/math.1999.0213 · Cited by 531
Self-citationMcGill, S. M. (1991) · Journal of Orthopaedic Research · doi:10.1002/jor.1100090112 · Cited by 482
O’Sullivan, P. B., Grahamslaw, K. M., Kendell, M., Lapenskie, S. C., Möller, N. E., & Richards, K. V. (2002) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200206010-00019 · Cited by 390
Self-citationLow back joint loading and kinematics during standing and unsupported sitting
Callaghan, J. P., & McGill, S. M. (2001) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140130010008110 · Cited by 354
The Effects of Abdominal Muscle Coactivation on Lumbar Spine Stability
Gardner-Morse, M. G., & Stokes, I. A. F. (1998) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-199801010-00019 · Cited by 345
Dankaerts, W., OʼSullivan, P., Burnett, A., & Straker, L. (2006) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000202532.76925.d2 · Cited by 341
Self-citation
Cited by
Richards, K. V., Beales, D. J., Smith, A. J., O'Sullivan, P. B., & Straker, L. M. (2016) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20150660 · Cited by 85
Self-citationSánchez Romero, E. A., Alonso Pérez, J. L., Muñoz Fernández, A. C., Battaglino, A., Castaldo, M., Cleland, J. A., & Villafañe, J. H. (2021) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics11040632 · Cited by 37
Parameters characterizing the posture of preterm children in standing and sitting position
Drzał-Grabiec, J., Walicka-Cupryś, K., Zajkiewicz, K., Rachwał, M., Piwoński, P., & Perenc, L. (2020) · Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation · doi:10.3233/bmr-170882 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- O’Sullivan, P. B., Dankaerts, W., Burnett, A. F., Farrell, G. T., Jefford, E., Naylor, C. S., & O’Sullivan, K. J.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 2006-09
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- E707-E712
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2087392464
- Cited by
- 295
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 11.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Different Upright Sitting Postures on Spinal-Pelvic Curvature and Trunk Muscle Activation in a Pain-Free Population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.brs.0000234735.98075.50
- The paper
- O’Sullivan, P. B., Dankaerts, W., Burnett, A. F., Farrell, G. T., Jefford, E., Naylor, C. S., & O’Sullivan, K. J. (2006). Effect of Different Upright Sitting Postures on Spinal-Pelvic Curvature and Trunk Muscle Activation in a Pain-Free Population. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000234735.98075.50
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.