Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 196

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of filgrastim in patients hospitalized with pneumonia and severe sepsis*

Root, Richard K., Lodato, Robert F., Patrick, Ward, Cade, John Francis, Fotheringham, Nick, Milwee, Steven, Vincent, Jean-Louis, Torres, Antonio, Rello, Jordi, Nelson, Steve·2003·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in combination with intravenous antibiotics to reduce the rate of mortality in patients with pneumonia and sepsis. DESIGN: This study was multicenter, double-blind, and randomized. SETTING: Intensive care units PATIENTS Adult patients with bacterial pneumonia, either acquired or nosocomial, as confirmed by chest radiograph and positive culture or Gram-negative stain, and severe sepsis, defined as sepsis-induced hypotension or organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: Standard antibiotic therapy with or without filgrastim (300 microg/day) or placebo administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion. The study drug was started within 24 hrs of enrollment and was continued for 5 days or until the white blood cell count reached >75.0 x 10(9) cells/L. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was the occurrence of mortality through day 29; secondary end points included occurrence of subsequent organ dysfunction, time to discharge from intensive care unit, number of days on mechanical ventilatory support, and time to death. Study-related observations were recorded through day 10 and included vital signs, onset of organ dysfunction, clinical laboratory variables, and adverse events. Filgrastim increased the white blood cell count to a median peak of 31.7 x 10(9) cells/L from a baseline of 12.3 x 10(9) cells/L. The two groups were well matched and did not differ significantly with regard to severe adverse events, time to death, occurrence of end-organ dysfunction, days of intensive care unit hospitalization, or days on mechanical ventilatory support. Mortality was low in both treatment groups; the mortality rate in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of filgrastim to the antibiotic and supportive care treatment of patients with pneumonia complicated by severe sepsis appeared to be safe, but not efficacious in reducing mortality rates or complications from this infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000048629.32625.5d

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 196

Metadata

Authors
Root, R. K., Lodato, R. F., Patrick, W., Cade, J. F., Fotheringham, N., Milwee, S., Vincent, J.-L., Torres, A., Rello, J., & Nelson, S.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-02
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
367-373
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116423522
Cited by
196
References
2
FWCI
14.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of filgrastim in patients hospitalized with pneumonia and severe sepsis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000048629.32625.5d
The paper
Root, R. K., Lodato, R. F., Patrick, W., Cade, J. F., Fotheringham, N., Milwee, S., Vincent, J.-L., Torres, A., Rello, J., & Nelson, S. (2003). Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of filgrastim in patients hospitalized with pneumonia and severe sepsis*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000048629.32625.5d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.