Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 397

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Six-month neuropsychological outcome of medical intensive care unit patients

Jackson, James C., Hart, Robert P., Gordon, Sharon M., Shintani, Ayumi, Truman, Brenda, May, Lisa, Ely, E. Wesley·2003·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine neuropsychological function, depression, and quality of life 6 months after discharge in patients who received mechanical ventilation in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Tertiary care, medical and coronary intensive care unit of a university-based medical center. STUDY POPULATION: A total of 275 consecutive, mechanically ventilated patients from a medical intensive care unit were prospectively followed. At 6 months, 157 were alive, of whom 41 (26%) returned for extensive follow-up testing. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Neuropsychological testing and assessment of depression and quality of life were performed at 6-month follow-up. Seven of 41 patients were excluded from further analysis due to preexisting cognitive impairment determined via surrogate interviews using the Modified Blessed Dementia Rating Scale and a review of medical records. On the basis of strict criteria derived from normative data, we found that 11 of 34 patients (32%) were neuropsychologically impaired. Impairment was generally diffuse but occurred primarily in areas of psychomotor speed, visual and working memory, verbal fluency, and visuo-construction. The rate of neuropsychological deficits in the study population was markedly higher than population norms for mild dementia. Scores on the Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form were significantly more abnormal in the neuropsychologically impaired group than in the nonimpaired group at hospital discharge (p =.04) and at 6-month follow-up (p =.02), and clinically significant depression was found in 27% of impaired subjects at hospital discharge and in 36% at 6-month follow-up. No differences were observed between groups in quality of life as measured with the Short Form Health Survey-12 at discharge or 6-month follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged neuropsychological impairment is common among survivors of the medical intensive care unit and occurs with greater than anticipated frequency when compared with relevant normative data. Future investigations are warranted to elucidate the nature of the association between critical illness, neuropsychological impairment, depression, and decreased quality of life.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000059996.30263.94

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 397

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, J. C., Hart, R. P., Gordon, S. M., Shintani, A., Truman, B., May, L., & Ely, E. W.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1226-1234
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029216908
Cited by
397
References
8
FWCI
13.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Six-month neuropsychological outcome of medical intensive care unit patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000059996.30263.94
The paper
Jackson, J. C., Hart, R. P., Gordon, S. M., Shintani, A., Truman, B., May, L., & Ely, E. W. (2003). Six-month neuropsychological outcome of medical intensive care unit patients. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000059996.30263.94

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.