Cited by 359Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAging, Health, and DisabilityFrailty in Older Adults

The hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline in older persons

Njegovan, V., Man-Son-Hing, M., Mitchell, S. L., Molnar, F. J.·2001·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We studied a representative cohort of community-dwelling elderly persons to (i) examine the relationship between the loss of specific functional activities and cognitive status at the time of these losses, (ii) compare the cognitive status of participants who have and have not lost independence in these functional activities, and (iii) determine whether a hierarchical scale of functional loss is associated with declining cognitive status. METHODS: A cohort of 5874 community-dwelling persons aged 65 years and older from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging I and II were analyzed. At baseline and 5 years later, cognitive status with the Modified Mini-Mental State Examination (3MS) and functional status with 14 Older American Resources and Services (OARS) items were measured. For each OARS functional item, the mean 3MS scores for persons who lost independence during the 5-year period versus those who did not were compared. RESULTS: For each functional item, the 5-year decline in 3MS scores of persons who lost independence were significantly greater than those who remained independent (e.g., ability to do finances), with an 18-point decline for those who lost independence and a 2-point decline for those who retained independence. A hierarchy of functional items existed, with instrumental activities of daily living (ADLs) (e.g., shopping, banking, and cooking) being lost at higher cognitive scores than basic ADL items (e.g., eating, dressing, and walking), although there was some overlap. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first prospective study using a large representative cohort of elderly persons to demonstrate that progressive cognitive decline is associated with a specific pattern of loss of functional tasks. Clear cognitive thresholds at which development of dependency in OARS functional items occurred. By providing estimates of the cognitive status of persons at the time at which they developed dependency in specific functional items, a natural hierarchy of functional loss associated with cognitive decline emerged. For caregivers, clinicians, and health policy makers, this information can help anticipate the pattern of functional decline and the subsequent care needs of persons with declining cognition, potentially improving the quality of life of these persons and their caregivers and playing an important part in health care planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/56.10.m638

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People who live alone are often solely responsible for completing household tasks, such as paying the bills, shopping, cleaning, maintenance, and answering the telephone or door, which all require cognitive input.

    “People who live alone are often solely responsible for completing household tasks, such as paying the bills, shopping, cleaning, maintenance, and answering the telephone or door, which all require cognitive input (Jekel et al., 2015;Njegovan, Man-Son-Hing, Mitchell, & Molnar, 2001).”

    From Living alone and cognitive function in later life (2019) · cites this paper as Njegovan et al., 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Njegovan, V., Man-Son-Hing, M., Mitchell, S. L., & Molnar, F. J.
Affiliations
Ottawa Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Njegovan, V.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2001-10-01
Volume
56
Issue
10
Pages
M638-M643
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2139100680
Cited by
359
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 18
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
Keywords
cognitive decline, functional loss, older adults, instrumental activities of daily living, basic activities of daily living, dependency, cognitive thresholds, community-dwelling older adults, Canadian Study of Health and Aging, care needs
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Canada, Cognition, Cognition Disorders, Female, Persons with Disabilities, Disabled Persons, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Risk Factors, Cohort Studies, Geriatric Assessment, Incidence, Multivariate Analysis, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution, Disease Progression, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review