Cited by 759Respiratory Support and MechanismsIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

Two-Year Cognitive, Emotional, and Quality-of-Life Outcomes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Hopkins, Ramona O., Weaver, Lindell K., Collingridge, Dave, Parkinson, R. Bruce, Chan, Karen J., Orme, James F.·2005·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a high mortality and is associated with significant morbidity. Prior outcome studies have focused predominant on short-term outcomes (6–12 months). We assessed longitudinal neurocognitive, emotional, and quality of life in ARDS survivors at hospital discharge, and 1 and 2 years after hospital discharge using neuropsychologic tests and emotional and quality-of-life questionnaires. Neurocognitive sequelae occurred in 73% (54 of 74) of ARDS survivors at hospital discharge, 46% (30 of 66) at 1 year, and 47% (29 of 62) at 2 years. ARDS survivors report moderate to severe depression (16% and 23%) and anxiety (24% and 23%) at 1 and 2 years, respectively. The ARDS survivors had decreased quality of life, with the physical domains improving at 1 year, with no additional change at 2 years. Role emotional, pain, and general health did not change from hospital discharge to 2 years. Mental health improved during the first year and declined at 2 years. ARDS results in significant neurocognitive and emotional morbidity and decreased quality of life that persists at least 2 years after hospital discharge. ARDS can cause significant long-term, brain-related morbidity manifest by neurocognitive impairments and decreased quality of life.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200406-763oc

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hopkins, R. O., Weaver, L. K., Collingridge, D., Parkinson, R. B., Chan, K. J., & Orme, J. F.
Affiliations
Brigham Young University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-02
Volume
171
Issue
4
Pages
340-347
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2077201173
Cited by
759
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 38
FWCI
20.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (HL-50513)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
acute respiratory distress syndrome, ARDS survivors, neuropsychological sequelae, post-traumatic cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, quality of life, long-term outcomes, brain injury
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Time Factors, Comorbidity, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Survivors, Sickness Impact Profile, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review