Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 330

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*

Haupt, Marilyn T., Bekes, Carolyn E., Brilli, Richard J., Carl, Linda C., Gray, Anthony W., Jastremski, Michael S., Naylor, Douglas F., PharmD, Maria Rudis,, MD, Antoinette Spevetz,, Wedel, Suzanne K., MD, Mathilda Horst,·2003·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe three levels of hospital-based critical care centers to optimally match services and personnel with community needs, and to recommend essential intensive care unit services and personnel for each critical care level. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary writing panel of professionals with expertise in the clinical practice of critical care medicine working under the direction of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM). DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a systematic Medline search and synthesized by the ACCM writing panel, a multidisciplinary group of critical care experts. Consensus for the final written document was reached through collaboration in meetings and through electronic communication modalities. Literature cited included previously written guidelines from the ACCM, published expert opinion and statements from official organizations, published review articles, and nonrandomized, historical cohort investigations. With this background, the ACCM writing panel described a three-tiered system of intensive care units determined by service-based criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for optimal intensive care unit services and personnel for hospitals with varying resources will facilitate both local and regional delivery of consistent and excellent care to critically ill patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000094227.89800.93

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 330

Metadata

Authors
Haupt, M. T., Bekes, C. E., Brilli, R. J., Carl, L. C., Gray, A. W., Jastremski, M. S., Naylor, D. F., PharmD, M. R., MD, A. S., Wedel, S. K., & MD, M. H.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2003-11
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
2677-2683
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1987918037
Cited by
330
References
1
FWCI
20.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000094227.89800.93
The paper
Haupt, M. T., Bekes, C. E., Brilli, R. J., Carl, L. C., Gray, A. W., Jastremski, M. S., Naylor, D. F., PharmD, M. R., MD, A. S., Wedel, S. K., & MD, M. H. (2003). Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000094227.89800.93

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.