The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe three levels of hospital-based critical care centers to optimally match services and personnel with community needs, and to recommend essential intensive care unit services and personnel for each critical care level. PARTICIPANTS: A multidisciplinary writing panel of professionals with expertise in the clinical practice of critical care medicine working under the direction of the American College of Critical Care Medicine (ACCM). DATA SOURCES AND SYNTHESIS: Relevant medical literature was accessed through a systematic Medline search and synthesized by the ACCM writing panel, a multidisciplinary group of critical care experts. Consensus for the final written document was reached through collaboration in meetings and through electronic communication modalities. Literature cited included previously written guidelines from the ACCM, published expert opinion and statements from official organizations, published review articles, and nonrandomized, historical cohort investigations. With this background, the ACCM writing panel described a three-tiered system of intensive care units determined by service-based criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines for optimal intensive care unit services and personnel for hospitals with varying resources will facilitate both local and regional delivery of consistent and excellent care to critically ill patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bates, D. W. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.15.1311 · Cited by 2,107
Cited by
Nates, J. L., Nunnally, M., Kleinpell, R., Blosser, S., Goldner, J., Birriel, B., Fowler, C. S., Byrum, D., Miles, W. S., Bailey, H., et al. (2016) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000001856 · Cited by 683
Valentin, A., Ferdinande, P., & ESICM Working Group on Quality Improvement (2011) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-011-2300-7 · Cited by 331
Lundgrén-Laine, H., Kontio, E., Perttilä, J., Korvenranta, H., Forsström, J., & Salanterä, S. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10341 · Cited by 43
Introduction of Tele-ICU in rural hospitals: Changing organisational culture to harness benefits
Goedken, C. C., Moeckli, J., Cram, P. M., & Reisinger, H. S. (2017) · Intensive and Critical Care Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.iccn.2016.10.001 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Haupt, M. T., Bekes, C. E., Brilli, R. J., Carl, L. C., Gray, A. W., Jastremski, M. S., Naylor, D. F., PharmD, M. R., MD, A. S., Wedel, S. K., & MD, M. H.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2003-11
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2677-2683
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987918037
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 20.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000094227.89800.93
- The paper
- Haupt, M. T., Bekes, C. E., Brilli, R. J., Carl, L. C., Gray, A. W., Jastremski, M. S., Naylor, D. F., PharmD, M. R., MD, A. S., Wedel, S. K., & MD, M. H. (2003). Guidelines on critical care services and personnel: Recommendations based on a system of categorization of three levels of care*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000094227.89800.93
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.