The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Current opinions regarding the importance, diagnosis, and management of delirium in the intensive care unit: A survey of 912 healthcare professionals*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Recently published clinical practice guidelines of the Society of Critical Care Medicine recommend monitoring for the presence of delirium in all mechanically ventilated patients because of the potential for adverse outcomes associated with this comorbidity, yet little is known about healthcare professionals' opinions regarding intensive care unit delirium or how they manage this organ dysfunction. The aim of this survey was to assess the medical community's beliefs and practices regarding delirium in the intensive care unit. DESIGN: Survey administration was conducted both without a delirium definition (phase 1) and then with a definition of delirium (phase 2). SETTING: Critical care meetings and continuing medical education/board review courses from October 2001 to July 2002. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of physicians (n = 753), nurses (n = 113), pharmacists (n = 13), physician assistants (n = 12), respiratory care practitioners (n = 8), and others (n = 13). INTERVENTIONS: Survey. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Participants completed 912 of the surveys. The majority (68%) of respondents thought that >25% of adult mechanically ventilated patients experience delirium. Delirium was considered a significant or very serious problem in the intensive care unit by 92% of healthcare professionals, yet underdiagnosis was acknowledged by 78%. Only 40% reported routinely screening for delirium, and only 16% indicated using a specific tool for delirium assessment. Delirium was considered important in the outcome of elderly and young patients by 89% and 60% of the respondents, respectively (p <.0001). The most serious complications these professionals associated with delirium were prolonged mechanical ventilation, self-injury, and respiratory difficulties. Delirium was treated with haloperidol by 66% of the respondents, with lorazepam by 12%, and with atypical antipsychotics by <5%. More than 55% administered haloperidol and lorazepam at daily doses of < or =10 mg, but some used >50 mg/day of either medication. CONCLUSIONS: Most healthcare professionals consider delirium in the intensive care unit a common and serious problem, although few actually monitor for this condition and most admit that it is underdiagnosed. Data from this survey point to a disconnect between the perceived significance of delirium in the intensive care unit and current practices of monitoring and treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
ASSESSMENT OF COMA AND IMPAIRED CONSCIOUSNESS
Teasdale, G., & Jennett, B. (1974) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(74)91639-0 · Cited by 13,215
Ely, E. W., Inouye, S. K., Bernard, G. R., Gordon, S., Francis, J., May, L., Truman, B., Speroff, T., Gautam, S., Margolin, R., et al. (2001) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.286.21.2703 · Cited by 3,210
Self-citationIntensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool
Bergeron, N., Dubois, M.-J., Dumont, M., Dial, S., & Skrobik, Y. (2001) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001340100909 · Cited by 1,487
Inouye, S. K., Viscoli, C. M., Horwitz, R. I., Hurst, L. D., & Tinetti, M. E. (1993) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-119-6-199309150-00005 · Cited by 854
Delirium in an intensive care unit: a study of risk factors
Dubois, M.-J., Bergeron, N., Dumont, M., Dial, S., & Skrobik, Y. (2001) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s001340101017 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Delirium as a Predictor of Mortality in Mechanically Ventilated Patients in the Intensive Care Unit
Ely, E. W. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.14.1753 · Cited by 3,073
Self-citationPandharipande, P., Shintani, A., Peterson, J., Pun, B. T., Wilkinson, G. R., Dittus, R. S., Bernard, G. R., & Ely, E. W. (2006) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/00000542-200601000-00005 · Cited by 1,238
Self-citationDelirium in the intensive care unit
Girard, T. D., Pandharipande, P. P., & Ely, E. W. (2008) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc6149 · Cited by 622
Self-citationHaloperidol and Ziprasidone for Treatment of Delirium in Critical Illness
Girard, T. D., Exline, M. C., Carson, S. S., Hough, C. L., Rock, P., Gong, M. N., Douglas, I. S., Malhotra, A., Owens, R. L., Feinstein, D. J., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1808217 · Cited by 573
Self-citationPandharipande, P., Cotton, B. A., Shintani, A., Thompson, J., Pun, B. T., Morris, J. A., Dittus, R., & Ely, E. W. (2008) · Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/ta.0b013e31814b2c4d · Cited by 554
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ely, E. W., Stephens, R. K., Jackson, J. C., Thomason, J. W. W., Truman, B., Gordon, S., Dittus, R. S., & Bernard, G. R.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 106-112
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021714808
- Cited by
- 359
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 14.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Current opinions regarding the importance, diagnosis, and management of delirium in the intensive care unit: A survey of 912 healthcare professionals*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000098033.94737.84
- The paper
- Ely, E. W., Stephens, R. K., Jackson, J. C., Thomason, J. W. W., Truman, B., Gordon, S., Dittus, R. S., & Bernard, G. R. (2004). Current opinions regarding the importance, diagnosis, and management of delirium in the intensive care unit: A survey of 912 healthcare professionals*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000098033.94737.84
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.