Cited by 1,487Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersAlcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool

Bergeron, N., Dubois, M.-J., Dumont, M., Dial, S., Skrobik, Y.·2001·Intensive Care Medicine

Abstract

Objective Delirium in the intensive care unit is poorly defined. Clinical evaluation is difficult in the setting of unstable, often intubated patients. A screening tool may improve the detection of delirium.Method We created a screening checklist of eight items based on DSM criteria and features of delirium: altered level of consciousness, inattention, disorientation, hallucination or delusion, psychomotor agitation or retardation, inappropriate mood or speech, sleep/wake cycle disturbance, and symptom fluctuation. During 3 months, all patients admitted to a busy medical/surgical intensive care unit were evaluated, and the scale score was compared to a psychiatric evaluation.Results In 93 patients studied, 15 developed delirium. Fourteen (93%) of them had a score of 4 points or more. This score was also present in 15 (19%) of patients without delirium, 14 of whom had a known psychiatric illness, dementia, a structural neurological abnormality or encephalopathy. A ROC analysis was used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the screening tool. The area under the ROC curve is 0.9017. Predicted sensitivity is 99% and specificity is 64%.Conclusion This study suggests that the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist can easily be applied by a clinician or a nurse in a busy critical care setting to screen all patients even when communication is compromised. The tool can be utilized quickly and helps to identify delirious patients. Earlier diagnosis may lead to earlier intervention and better patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s001340100909

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Delirium was assessed twice daily by nurses or physicians until ICU discharge using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC).

    “Similarly, delirium was assessed for each patient twice daily by nurses or physicians until ICU discharge by using the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC) score [22] (Additional data file 3).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bergeron, N., Dubois, M.-J., Dumont, M., Dial, S., & Skrobik, Y.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Corresponding author
Skrobik, Y.
Venue
Intensive Care Medicine
Published
2001-04-20
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
859-864
ISSN
  • 0342-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1238
OpenAlex
W2143617649
Cited by
1,487
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 78 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 94 · 2022: 80 · 2021: 96 · 2020: 110 · 2019: 78 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 66 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 74 · 2012: 73
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Intensive Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
delirium, intensive care unit, delirium screening, screening checklist, intensive care, altered level of consciousness, psychomotor agitation, sleep-wake disturbances, sensitivity and specificity, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Critical Care, Delirium, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Surveys and Questionnaires, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Critical Illness, APACHE

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review