Cited by 140Intensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersRespiratory Support and MechanismsAnesthesia and Sedative Agents

Haloperidol use is associated with lower hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients*

Milbrandt, Eric B., Kersten, Alexander, Kong, Lan, Weissfeld, Lisa A., Clermont, Gilles, Fink, Mitchell P., Angus, Derek C.·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether haloperidol use is associated with lower mortality in mechanically ventilated patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: A large tertiary care academic medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 989 patients mechanically ventilated for >48 hrs. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We compared differences in hospital mortality between patients who received haloperidol within 2 days of initiation of mechanical ventilation and those who never received haloperidol. Despite similar baseline characteristics, patients treated with haloperidol had significantly lower hospital mortality compared with those who never received haloperidol (20.5% vs. 36.1%; p = .004). The lower associated mortality persisted after adjusting for age, comorbidity, severity of illness, degree of organ dysfunction, admitting diagnosis, and other potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Haloperidol was associated with significantly lower hospital mortality. These findings could have enormous implications for critically ill patients. Because of their observational nature and the potential risks associated with haloperidol use, they require confirmation in a randomized, controlled trial before being applied to routine patient care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000150743.16005.9a

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a retrospective cohort study of mechanically ventilated patients, haloperidol use was associated with lower hospital mortality, at least in part because of reduced use of sedatives and analgesics.

    “In a retrospective cohort study focusing on mechanically ventilated patients [32], haloperidol use was associated with lower hospital mortality, at least in part because of a reduced use of sedatives and analgesics.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milbrandt, E. B., Kersten, A., Kong, L., Weissfeld, L. A., Clermont, G., Fink, M. P., & Angus, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
226-229
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2113801876
Cited by
140
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
FWCI
12.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine › Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Keywords
haloperidol, mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality, critically ill patients, antipsychotic drugs, organ dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Critical Care, Delirium, Female, Haloperidol, Humans, Immunologic Factors, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Agitation, Respiration, Artificial, Retrospective Studies, Antipsychotic Agents, Cohort Studies, Survival Rate, Procedural Sedation, Critical Illness, Hospital Mortality, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review