The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review
Abstract
Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common nosocomial infection in critically ill patients. The clinical and economic consequences of VAP are unclear, with a broad range of values reported in the literature Objective: To perform a systematic review to determine the incidence of VAP and its attributable mortality rate, length of stay, and costs. Data Source: Computerized PUBMED and MEDLINE search supplemented by manual searches for relevant articles, limited to articles published after 1990. Study Selection: English-language observational studies and randomized trials that provided data on the incidence of VAP were included. Matched cohort studies were included for calculation of attributable mortality rate and length of stay. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on patient population, diagnostic criteria for VAP, incidence, outcome, type of intensive care unit, and study design. Data Synthesis: The cumulative incidence of VAP was calculated by combining the results of several studies using standard formulas for combining proportions, in which the weighted average and variance are calculated. Results from studies comparing intensive care unit and hospital mortality due to VAP, additional length of stay, and additional days of mechanical ventilation were pooled using a random effects model, with assessment of heterogeneity. Results: Our findings indicate a) between 10% and 20% of patients receiving >48 hrs of mechanical ventilation will develop VAP; b) critically ill patients who develop VAP appear to be twice as likely to die compared with similar patients without VAP (pooled odds ratio, 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.16–3.56); c) patients with VAP have significantly longer intensive care unit lengths of stay (mean = 6.10 days; 95% confidence interval, 5.32–6.87 days); and d) patients who develop VAP incur ≥$10,019 in additional hospital costs. Conclusions: Ventilator-associated pneumonia occurs in a considerable proportion of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation and is associated with substantial morbidity, a two-fold mortality rate, and excess cost. Given these findings, strategies that effectively prevent VAP are urgently needed. LEARNING OBJECTIVES On completion of this article, the reader should be able to: Define the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in mechanically ventilated patients. Explain the economic consequences of VAP. Use this information in a clinical setting. All authors have disclosed that they have no financial relationships or interests in any commercial companies pertaining to this educational activity. Wolters Kluwer Health has identified and resolved all faculty conflicts of interest regarding this educational activity. Visit the Critical Care Medicine Web site (www.ccmjournal.org) for information on obtaining continuing medical education credit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Drakulovic, M. B., Torres, A., Bauer, T. T., Nicolas, J. M., Nogué, S., & Ferrer, M. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(98)12251-1 · Cited by 1,243 · cited 1×
“Preventive strategy: selective digestive decontamination Wiener, 1995 (58) 48 hrs 31 8 (26) Clinical Medical-surgical ICU Winter, 1992 (59) 48 hrs 92 18 (20) Clinical and BAL Medical-surgical ICU Ferrer, 1994 (60) 72 hrs 41 10 (24) Clinical and PSB/BAL Respiratory ICU Pugin, 1991 (61) 48 hrs 27 21 (78) Clinical Surgic…”
Early versus late enteral feeding of mechanically ventilated patients: Results of a clinical trial.
Ibrahim, E., Mehringer, L., Prentice, D., Sherman, G., Schaiff, R., Fraser, V, & Kollef, M. (2002) · Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · doi:10.1177/0148607102026003174 · Cited by 341
Cited by
Hospital Epidemiology and Infection Control in Acute-Care Settings
Sydnor, E. R. M., & Perl, T. M. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00027-10 · Cited by 652
Muscedere, J., Rewa, O., Mckechnie, K., Jiang, X., Laporta, D., & Heyland, D. K. (2011) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318218a4d9 · Cited by 311
Does This Patient Have Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia?
Klompas, M. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.14.1583 · Cited by 304
Pugh, R., Grant, C., Cooke, R. P., & Dempsey, G. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007577.pub3 · Cited by 289
Positive pressure ventilation in the cardiac intensive care unit
Alviar, C. L., Miller, P. E., McAreavey, D., Katz, J. N., Lee, B., Moriyama, B., Soble, J., van Diepen, S., Solomon, M. A., & Morrow, D. A. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.06.074 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Authors
- Safdar, N., Dezfulian, C., Collard, H. R., & Saint, S.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2005-10
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2184-2193
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1984152908
- Cited by
- 1,086
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000181731.53912.d9
- The paper
- Safdar, N., Dezfulian, C., Collard, H. R., & Saint, S. (2005). Clinical and economic consequences of ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000181731.53912.d9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.