Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 552

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients*

Nava, Stefano, Gregoretti, Cesare, Fanfulla, Francesco, Squadrone, Enzo, Grassi, Mario, Carlucci, Annalisa, Beltrame, Fabio, Navalesi, Paolo·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Compared with standard medical therapy (SMT), noninvasive ventilation (NIV) does not reduce the need for reintubation in unselected patients who develop respiratory failure after extubation. The goal of this study was to assess whether early application of NIV, immediately after extubation, is effective in preventing postextubation respiratory failure in an at-risk population. DESIGN: Multiple-center, randomized controlled study. SETTING: Multiple hospitals. PATIENTS: Ninety-seven consecutive patients with similar baseline characteristics, requiring >48 hrs of mechanical ventilation and considered at risk of developing postextubation respiratory failure (i.e., patients who had hypercapnia, congestive heart failure, ineffective cough and excessive tracheobronchial secretions, more than one failure of a weaning trial, more than one comorbid condition, and upper airway obstruction). INTERVENTIONS: After a successful weaning trial, the patients were randomized to receive NIV for > or = 8 hrs a day in the first 48 hrs or SMT. Primary outcome was the need for reintubation according to standardized criteria. Secondary outcomes were intensive care unit and hospital mortality, as well as time spent in the intensive care unit and in hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with the SMT group, the NIV group had a lower rate of reintubation (four of 48 vs. 12 of 49; p = .027). The need for reintubation was associated with a higher risk of mortality (p < .01). The use of NIV resulted in a reduction of risk of intensive care unit mortality (-10%, p < .01), mediated by the reduction for the need of reintubation. CONCLUSIONS: NIV was more effective than SMT in preventing postextubation respiratory failure in a population considered at risk of developing this complication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000186416.44752.72

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 552

Metadata

Authors
Nava, S., Gregoretti, C., Fanfulla, F., Squadrone, E., Grassi, M., Carlucci, A., Beltrame, F., & Navalesi, P.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2465-2470
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129853084
Cited by
552
References
36
FWCI
17.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000186416.44752.72
The paper
Nava, S., Gregoretti, C., Fanfulla, F., Squadrone, E., Grassi, M., Carlucci, A., Beltrame, F., & Navalesi, P. (2005). Noninvasive ventilation to prevent respiratory failure after extubation in high-risk patients*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000186416.44752.72

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.