Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 195

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy*

Dara, Saqib I., Rana, Rimki, Afessa, Bekele, Moore, S Breanndan, Gajic, Ognjen·2005·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although restrictive red cell transfusion practice has become a standard of care in the critically ill, data on the use of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) are limited. We hypothesized that the practice of FFP transfusion in the medical intensive care unit is variable and that liberal use may not be associated with improved outcome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: A 24-bed medical intensive care unit in a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to a medical intensive care unit during a 5-month period who had abnormal coagulation defined as international normalized ratio (INR) of > or = 1.5-times normal. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected data on demographics, severity of illness as measured by Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scores, INR, bleeding episodes, and transfusion complications. We identified 115 patients with coagulopathy (INR of > or = 1.5) but without active bleeding. A total of 44 patients (38.3%) received FFP transfusion. INR was corrected in 16 of 44 patients (36%) who received transfusion. Median dose of FFP was 17 mL/kg in patients who had INR corrected vs. 10 mL/kg in those who did not (p = .018). There was no difference in age, sex, APACHE III scores, liver disease, Coumadin treatment, or INR level between those who did and did not receive FFP. Invasive procedures (68.2% vs. 40.8%, p = .004) and history of recent gastrointestinal bleeding (41% vs. 7%, p < .001) were more frequent in the group with transfusion. Although there was no difference in new bleeding episodes (6.8% in transfused vs. 2.8% in nontransfused group, p = .369), new onset acute lung injury was more frequent in the transfused group (18% vs. 4%, p = .021). Adjusted for severity of illness, hospital mortality and intensive care unit length of stay among survivors were not different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The risk-benefit ratio of FFP transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy may not be favorable. Randomized controlled trials evaluating restrictive vs. liberal FFP transfusion strategies are warranted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000186745.53059.f0

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 195

Metadata

Authors
Dara, S. I., Rana, R., Afessa, B., Moore, S. B., & Gajic, O.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-11
Volume
33
Issue
11
Pages
2667-2671
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129819526
Cited by
195
References
2
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000186745.53059.f0
The paper
Dara, S. I., Rana, R., Afessa, B., Moore, S. B., & Gajic, O. (2005). Fresh frozen plasma transfusion in critically ill medical patients with coagulopathy*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000186745.53059.f0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.