The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients*
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group published a consensus definition (the RIFLE criteria) for acute renal failure. We sought to assess the ability of the RIFLE criteria to predict mortality in hospital patients. DESIGN: Retrospective single-center study. SETTING: University-affiliated hospital. PATIENTS: All patients admitted to the study hospital between January 2000 and December 2002. Patients were excluded if they were younger than 15 yrs old, were on chronic dialysis, or had kidney transplant or if their length of hospital stay was <24 hrs. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 20,126 patients. Mean age was 64 yrs, 14.7% of patients required intensive care unit admission, and hospital mortality was 8.0%. According to the RIFLE criteria, 9.1% of all patients were in the Risk category for acute renal failure, 5.2% were in the Injury category, and 3.7% were in the Failure category. There was an almost linear increase in hospital mortality from Normal to Failure (Normal, 4.4%; Risk, 15.1%; Injury, 29.2%; and Failure, 41.1%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that all RIFLE criteria were significantly predictive factors for hospital mortality, with an almost linear increase in odds ratios from Risk to Failure (odds ratios, Risk 2.5, Injury 5.4, Failure 10.1). CONCLUSIONS: The RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure classified close to 20% of our study patients as having some degrees of acute impairment in renal function and were useful in predicting their hospital mortality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Bernard, G. R., Artigas, A., Brigham, K. L., Carlet, J., Falke, K., Hudson, L., Lamy, M., Legall, J. R., Morris, A., & Spragg, R. (1994) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.149.3.7509706 · Cited by 6,746
Cited by
Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1)
Kellum, J. A., Lameire, N., & for the KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group (2013) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11454 · Cited by 2,827
Global epidemiology and outcomes of acute kidney injury
Hoste, E. A. J., Kellum, J. A., Selby, N. M., Zarbock, A., Palevsky, P. M., Bagshaw, S. M., Goldstein, S. L., Cerdá, J., & Chawla, L. S. (2018) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/s41581-018-0052-0 · Cited by 1,486
Acute kidney injury-epidemiology, outcomes and economics
Rewa, O., & Bagshaw, S. M. (2014) · Nature Reviews Nephrology · doi:10.1038/nrneph.2013.282 · Cited by 734
The definition of acute kidney injury and its use in practice
Thomas, M. E., Blaine, C., Dawnay, A., Devonald, M. A. J., Ftouh, S., Laing, C., Latchem, S., Lewington, A., Milford, D. V., & Ostermann, M. (2015) · Kidney International · doi:10.1038/ki.2014.328 · Cited by 722
Acute Kidney Injury Associates with Increased Long-Term Mortality
Lafrance, J.-P., & Miller, D. R. (2010) · Journal of the American Society of Nephrology · doi:10.1681/asn.2009060636 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Uchino, S., Bellomo, R., Goldsmith, D., Bates, S., & Ronco, C.
- Venue
- Critical Care Medicine
- Published
- 2006-07
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1913-1917
- ISSN
- 0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2116909658
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000224227.70642.4f
- The paper
- Uchino, S., Bellomo, R., Goldsmith, D., Bates, S., & Ronco, C. (2006). An assessment of the RIFLE criteria for acute renal failure in hospitalized patients*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000224227.70642.4f
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.