Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 675

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study*

Jaber, Samir, Amraoui, Jibba, Lefrant, Jean-Yves, Arich, Charles, Cohendy, Robert, Landreau, Liliane, Calvet, Yves, Capdevila, Xavier, Mahamat, Aba, Eledjam, Jean-Jacques·2006·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current practice of physicians, to report complications associated with endotracheal intubation (ETI) performed in THE intensive care unit (ICU), and to isolate predictive factors of immediate life-threatening complications. DESIGN: Multiple-center observational study. SETTING: Seven intensive care units of two university hospitals. PATIENTS: : We evaluated 253 occurrences of ETI in 220 patients. INTERVENTIONS: From January 1 to June 30, 2003, data related to all ETI performed in ICU were collected. Information regarding patient descriptors, procedures, and immediate complications were analyzed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The main indications to intubate the trachea were acute respiratory failure, shock, and coma. Some 148 ETIs (59%) were performed by residents. At least one severe complication occurred in 71 ETIs (28%): severe hypoxemia (26%), hemodynamic collapse (25%), and cardiac arrest (2%). The other complications were difficult intubation (12%), cardiac arrhythmia (10%), esophageal intubation (5%), and aspiration (2%). Presence of acute respiratory failure and the presence of shock as an indication for ETI were identified as independent risk factors for occurrence of complications, and ETI performed by a junior physician supervised by a senior (i.e., two operators) was identified as a protective factor for the occurrence of complications. CONCLUSIONS: ETI in ICU patients is associated with a high rate of immediate and severe life-threatening complications. Independent risk factors of complication occurrence were presence of acute respiratory failure and presence of shock as an indication for ETI. Further studies should aim to better define protocols for intubation in critically ill patients to make this procedure safer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000233879.58720.87

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 675

Metadata

Authors
Jaber, S., Amraoui, J., Lefrant, J.-Y., Arich, C., Cohendy, R., Landreau, L., Calvet, Y., Capdevila, X., Mahamat, A., & Eledjam, J.-J.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2006-09
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
2355-2361
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2086160501
Cited by
675
References
0
FWCI
17.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000233879.58720.87
The paper
Jaber, S., Amraoui, J., Lefrant, J.-Y., Arich, C., Cohendy, R., Landreau, L., Calvet, Y., Capdevila, X., Mahamat, A., & Eledjam, J.-J. (2006). Clinical practice and risk factors for immediate complications of endotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit: A prospective, multiple-center study*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000233879.58720.87

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.