Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 248

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microvascular response to red blood cell transfusion in patients with severe sepsis*

Sakr, Yasser, Chierego, Marialuisa, Piagnerelli, Michaël, Verdant, Colin, Dubois, Marc-Jacques, Koch, Marc, Creteur, Jacques, Gullo, Antonino, Vincent, Jean-Louis, De Backer, Daniel·2007·Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Microvascular alterations may play a role in the development of multiple organ failure in severe sepsis. The effects of red blood cell transfusions on microvascular perfusion are not well defined. We investigated the effects of red blood cell transfusion on sublingual microvascular perfusion in patients with sepsis. DESIGN: Prospective, observational study. SETTING: A 31-bed, medical-surgical intensive care unit of a university hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty-five patients with severe sepsis requiring red blood cell transfusions. INTERVENTIONS: Transfusion of one to two units of leukocyte-reduced red blood cells. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The sublingual microcirculation was assessed with an Orthogonal Polarization Spectral device before and 1 hr after red blood cell transfusion. Red blood cell transfusions increased hemoglobin concentration from 7.1 (25th-75th percentile, 6.7-7.6) to 8.1 (7.5-8.6) g/dL (p < .01), mean arterial pressure from 75 (69-89) to 82 (75-90) mm Hg (p < .01), and oxygen delivery from 349 (278-392) to 391 (273-473) mL/min.M (p < .001). Microvascular perfusion was not significantly altered by transfusion, but there was considerable interindividual variation. The change in capillary perfusion after transfusion correlated with baseline capillary perfusion (Spearman-rho = -.49; p = .003). Capillary perfusion was significantly lower at baseline in patients who increased their capillary perfusion by >8% compared with those who did not (57 [52-64] vs. 75 [70-79]; p < .01), while hemodynamic and global oxygen transport variables were similar in the two groups. Red blood cell storage time had no influence on the microvascular response to red blood cell transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: The sublingual microcirculation is globally unaltered by red blood cell transfusion in septic patients; however, it can improve in patients with altered capillary perfusion at baseline.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000269936.73788.32

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 248

Metadata

Authors
Sakr, Y., Chierego, M., Piagnerelli, M., Verdant, C., Dubois, M.-J., Koch, M., Creteur, J., Gullo, A., Vincent, J.-L., & De Backer, D.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-07
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1639-1644
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993028289
Cited by
248
References
3
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microvascular response to red blood cell transfusion in patients with severe sepsis*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ccm.0000269936.73788.32
The paper
Sakr, Y., Chierego, M., Piagnerelli, M., Verdant, C., Dubois, M.-J., Koch, M., Creteur, J., Gullo, A., Vincent, J.-L., & De Backer, D. (2007). Microvascular response to red blood cell transfusion in patients with severe sepsis*. Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ccm.0000269936.73788.32

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.