The DOI matches its Crossref record.
DNA methylation and cancer therapy: new developments and expectations
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In addition to having genetic causes, cancer can also be considered an epigenetic disease. The main epigenetic modification is DNA methylation, and patterns of aberrant DNA methylation are now recognized to be a common hallmark of human tumors. One of the most characteristic features is the inactivation of tumor-suppressor genes by CpG-island hypermethylation of the CpG islands located in their promoter regions. These sites, among others, are the targets of DNA-demethylating agents, the promising chemotherapeutic drugs that are the focus of this article. RECENT FINDINGS: Four exciting aspects have recently arisen at the forefront of the advancements in this field: first, the development of new compounds with DNA-demethylating capacity that are less toxic (for example, procaine) and may be administered orally (for example, zebularine); second, a better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms underlying the action of these drugs for particular genes and throughout the genome; third, the establishment of more reliable techniques to measure the effects of these drugs in clinical samples, such as high-performance capillary electrophoresis; and fourth, a decisive effort in the clinical trials that has merited the approval of 5-azacytidine by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome. SUMMARY: We are at the dawn of an era when epigenetic drugs will be an important weapon in our arsenal in the war against cancer. Hematological malignancies have provided a promising starting point, but studies will surely extend to all solid tumors. However, we need to continue our research to develop more specific DNA-demethylating agents, to understand their biologic effects, and to determine whether they may be successfully combined with other epigenetic drugs, such as the inhibitors of histone deacetylases, and classic chemotherapy compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Fraga, M. F., Ballestar, E., Villar-Garea, A., Boix-Chornet, M., Espada, J., Schotta, G., Bonaldi, T., Haydon, C., Ropero, S., Petrie, K., et al. (2005) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1531 · Cited by 1,923
Self-citationTranscriptional Regulatory Elements in the Human Genome
Maston, G. A., Evans, S. K., & Green, M. R. (2006) · Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genom.7.080505.115623 · Cited by 937
Oxidative stress, DNA methylation and carcinogenesis
Franco, R., Schoneveld, O., Georgakilas, A. G., & Panayiotidis, M. I. (2008) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2008.02.026 · Cited by 603
Global Levels of Histone Modifications Predict Prognosis in Different Cancers
Seligson, D. B., Horvath, S., McBrian, M. A., Mah, V., Yu, H., Tze, S., Wang, Q., Chia, D., Goodglick, L., & Kurdistani, S. K. (2009) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080874 · Cited by 508
Gure, A. O., Chua, R., Williamson, B., Gonen, M., Ferrera, C. A., Gnjatic, S., Ritter, G., Simpson, A. J. G., Chen, Y.-T., Old, L. J., et al. (2005) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-05-1203 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Esteller, M.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Oncology
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-60
- ISSN
- 1040-8746 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2021409968
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DNA methylation and cancer therapy: new developments and expectations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.cco.0000147383.04709.10
- The paper
- Esteller, M. (2005). DNA methylation and cancer therapy: new developments and expectations. Current Opinion in Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.cco.0000147383.04709.10
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.