Cited by 22Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research Topics

Phenomenology of depression in young girls

KEENAN, KATE, HIPWELL, ALISON, DUAX, JEANNE, STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, MAGDA, LOEBER, ROLF·2004·Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective To examine the prevalence of depressive symptoms, the overlap between caregiver and child report, the association between depression and anxiety, and the relationship between symptoms of depression and impairment in young girls.Method Participants in the Pittsburgh Girls Study, a community sample of 2,451 girls aged 5-8 years old and their primary caregivers were interviewed in 2000-2001 using the Child Symptom Inventory and the Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire to measure depression, the Screen for Child Anxiety and Related Emotional Disorders to measure anxiety, and the Children's Global Assessment Scale to measure impairment.Results Less than 1% of 5- to 8-year-old girls had five or more symptoms of major depression according to the caregiver report. Individual differences in symptom counts and depression scores by caregiver and child report were observed. Agreement between caregivers and girls on depression symptoms was low, with only 2% of the variance in caregiver-reported depression on the Child Symptom Inventory being accounted for by child report on the Short Moods and Feelings Questionnaire. The level of association between depression and anxiety scores suggested that these constructs are associated but relatively independent in young girls. Both caregiver report and child report of depressive symptoms were uniquely associated with impairment ratings.Conclusions Although major depression appears to be rare among 5- to 8-year-old girls, continuous measures of depressive symptoms yield significant individual differences that are associated with impairment. Thus, preliminary evidence suggests that depressive symptoms can be validly measured in 5- to 8-year-old girls.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.chi.0000131137.09111.d0

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KEENAN, K., HIPWELL, A., DUAX, J., STOUTHAMER-LOEBER, M., & LOEBER, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
KEENAN, KATE
Venue
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-09
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1098-1106
ISSN
0890-8567 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076660165
Cited by
22
References
27
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH066167, R01MH056630)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
childhood depression, depressive symptoms, young girls, preschool children, caregiver reports, child report, comorbid depression and anxiety, functional disability, prevalence, Pittsburgh Girls Study, Children's Global Assessment Scale
MeSH terms
Anxiety, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Individuality, Longitudinal Studies, Mass Screening, Pennsylvania, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Poverty, Psychometrics, Sampling Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review