The DOI matches its Crossref record.
White-to-White Corneal Diameter: Normal Values in Healthy Humans Obtained With the Orbscan II Topography System
Abstract
PURPOSE: The corneal horizontal diameter (white-to-white) is abnormal in diseases like microcornea, relative anterior microphthalmos, and corneal dystrophies. Because normal values are described imprecisely in the literature, the purpose of this study was to reevaluate the horizontal corneal diameter as a scientific parameter. METHODS: The horizontal corneal diameter was measured with the Orbscan II system in 370 right eyes and 373 left eyes of 390 healthy white subjects aged 10-80 years. There were 148 female subjects and 242 male subjects. Each measurement was repeated twice. Differences in gender, between right and left eyes, and age-related alterations were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: The average corneal diameter was 11.71 +/- 0.42 mm. The average corneal diameter was 11.77 +/- 0.37 mm in males compared with 11.64 +/- 0.47 mm in females. The resulting normal ranges were 11.04 to 12.50 for males and 10.70 to 12.58 mm for females. Differences in gender were not significant in the t test for independent samples (P = 0.071). There were no statistically significant differences between right and left eyes in the t test for dependent samples (P = 0.16). Corneal diameters decreased slightly with age. CONCLUSIONS: With the obtained normal values, more precise determination of microcornea and macrocornea will be possible in the future. The horizontal corneal diameter was not significantly greater in males than in females. Further studies are needed to show the reasons for the age-related decrease in measurements.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Anatomy and physiology of the cornea
DelMonte, D. W., & Kim, T. (2011) · Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.12.037 · Cited by 871
Anatomy of cornea and ocular surface
Sridhar, M. (2018) · Indian Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.4103/ijo.ijo_646_17 · Cited by 627
Cellular and extracellular matrix modulation of corneal stromal opacity
Torricelli, A. A. M., & Wilson, S. E. (2014) · Experimental Eye Research · doi:10.1016/j.exer.2014.09.013 · Cited by 124
Driessen, J. P., Borgstein, J. A., & Vuyk, H. D. (2011) · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery · doi:10.1097/scs.0b013e3182326dfb · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- R??fer, F., Schr??der, A., & Erb, C.
- Venue
- Cornea
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 259-261
- ISSN
- 0277-3740 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1994650249
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: White-to-White Corneal Diameter: Normal Values in Healthy Humans Obtained With the Orbscan II Topography System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ico.0000148312.01805.53
- The paper
- R??fer, F., Schr??der, A., & Erb, C. (2005). White-to-White Corneal Diameter: Normal Values in Healthy Humans Obtained With the Orbscan II Topography System. Cornea. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ico.0000148312.01805.53
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.