Cited by 34Reconstructive Facial Surgery TechniquesCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsCongenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies

Defining the protruding ear.

Driessen, Juliette P., Borgstein, Johannes A., Vuyk, Hadé D.·2011·Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although protruding ears are one of the most frequently occurring congenital deformities in the craniofacial area, there is no clear consensus in literature as to the definition. Our aim was to provide a clear delineation for the definition of prominent ears, deduced from the anthropometry of normal (nonprotruding) ears. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study to assess the anatomy of the normal auricle in children using computer-assisted anthropometry in photographs of 102 children aged 5 to 18 years. We compared the anatomy to retrospectively assess photographs of 44 patients who were listed for prominent ear correction. RESULTS: Our results show that protrusion differs statistically between sexes. In view of these data, an ear could be defined as prominent when the upper protrusion exceeds 21.5 mm or the lower protrusion exceeds 20.0 mm in boys and the upper protrusion exceeds 17.5 mm or the lower protrusion exceeds 15.5 mm in girls. Using these demarcations, 87.5% of our operated prominent ears would qualify as a prominent ear. In addition, we found that prominent ears have larger auricular lengths and consequently larger surface measurements compared with normal ears (P = 0.001). Up to 19.3% of the normal ears showed an asymmetry of more than 3 mm concerning protrusion. CONCLUSIONS: Protrusion differs significantly between sexes. This indicates that different criteria should be used to judge protrusion in boys and girls. None of our prominent ears exceeded only the demarcation in the lower protrusion, suggesting that upper protrusion plays a larger role in the perception of prominence than lower protrusion and should therefore be the main objective of corrective otoplasty. Furthermore, the variation of asymmetry of protrusion in the normal population indicates that an often used success criteria in otoplasty of an asymmetry less than 3 mm may be too strict.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/scs.0b013e3182326dfb

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Asymmetry greater than 3 mm occurs in 19.3% of normal ears, challenging rigid correction criteria.

    “Asymmetry greater than 3 mm occurs in 19.3% of normal ears, challenging rigid correction criteria.67”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Driessen, J. P., Borgstein, J. A., & Vuyk, H. D.
Affiliations
  • Erasmus MC - Sophia Children’s Hospital (NL)
  • Tergooi (NL)
Corresponding author
  • Driessen, Juliette P.
  • Borgstein, Johannes A.
Venue
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2011-11
Volume
22
Issue
6
Pages
2102-2108
ISSN
1049-2275 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063520909
Cited by
34
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Reconstructive Facial Surgery Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Congenital Ear and Nasal Anomalies
Keywords
prominent ears, protruding ears, otoplasty, sex differences, congenital craniofacial anomalies
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anthropometry, Child, Child, Preschool, Ear, External, Female, Humans, Male, Photography, Prospective Studies, Sex Factors, Plastic Surgery Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review