Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Micafungin, a Novel Echinocandin, in Premature Infants

Heresi, Gloria P., Gerstmann, Dale R., Reed, Michael D., van den Anker, John N., Blumer, Jeffrey L., Kovanda, Laura, Keirns, James J., Buell, Donald N., Kearns, Gregory L.·2006·The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: : Candidal fungal infection rates in neonates are increasing and are a significant cause of mortality, especially in low birth weight infants. Micafungin is an echinocandin that works by inhibiting 1,3-beta-D-glucan synthase, an enzyme responsible for fungal cell wall synthesis. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and pharmacokinetics of micafungin in premature infants. METHODS: : This was a phase I, single-dose, multicenter, open-label, sequential-dose trial of intravenous micafungin investigating 3 doses (0.75 mg/kg, 1.5 mg/kg and 3.0 mg/kg) in 18 premature infants weighing >1000 g (n = 6 in each dosage group). A further 5 infants (500-1000 g) were enrolled in the 0.75 mg/kg dosage group only. RESULTS: : The mean +/- standard deviation gestational age in the >1000 g dosage group was 26.4 +/- 2.4 weeks and, on entry, patients had one or more of a variety of underlying conditions, including sepsis, pneumonia and other infections caused by Candida or other species. Micafungin pharmacokinetics in preterm infants appears linear. However, premature infants >1000 g on average displayed a shorter half-life (8 hours) and a more rapid rate of clearance (approximately 39 mL/h per kg) compared with published data in older children and adults. All doses of micafungin were well tolerated and no serious drug-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: : Single doses of micafungin, ranging up to 3.0 mg/kg, appear well tolerated in premature infants weighing >1000 g. The drug's elimination half-life and total plasma clearance in preterm infants appear dissimilar to published values for these parameters in older children and adults. The reason(s) for this apparent difference remain to be investigated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.inf.0000245103.07614.e1

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Heresi, G. P., Gerstmann, D. R., Reed, M. D., van den Anker, J. N., Blumer, J. L., Kovanda, L., Keirns, J. J., Buell, D. N., & Kearns, G. L.
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2006-12
Volume
25
Issue
12
Pages
1110-1115
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2006876723
Cited by
183
References
6
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Micafungin, a Novel Echinocandin, in Premature Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.inf.0000245103.07614.e1
The paper
Heresi, G. P., Gerstmann, D. R., Reed, M. D., van den Anker, J. N., Blumer, J. L., Kovanda, L., Keirns, J. J., Buell, D. N., & Kearns, G. L. (2006). The Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Micafungin, a Novel Echinocandin, in Premature Infants. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.inf.0000245103.07614.e1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.