Cited by 65Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsInfection Control in Healthcare

Excess Costs of Hospital Care Associated With Neonatal Candidemia

Smith, P Brian, Morgan, Juliette, Benjamin, Daniel K., Fridkin, Scott K., Sanza, Laurie Thomson, Harrison, Lee H., Sofair, Andre N., Huie-White, Sharon +1 more·2007·Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nosocomial bloodstream infections are associated with increased hospital costs in adult and pediatric patients. Candida is an increasingly important nosocomial pathogen within intensive care nurseries. The purpose of this study was to determine the attributable cost of candidemia in neonates. METHODS: This case-control study included all neonates with candidemia receiving care in hospitals in Connecticut and in Baltimore County and the city of Baltimore, MD. We identified 47 cases and 130 control patients. Multivariable linear regression was used to control for state, birth weight and mortality to determine the effect of candidemia on length of stay, cost per day and total hospital costs. RESULTS: Candidemia was associated with a $28,000 increase in total hospital costs in multivariable analysis. This increase in total cost was the result of both an increase in costs per day and length of hospital stay. Other cost-increasing variables included in the analysis were: state of origin (Connecticut), survival and decreasing birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: This represents the first study of the adjusted costs of candidemia in neonates. In addition to high mortality, candidemia was associated with increased hospital costs. This cost analysis could be helpful in determining the financial benefits of preventing candidemia in high risk neonates.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.inf.0000253973.89097.c0

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith, P. B., Morgan, J., Benjamin, D. K., Fridkin, S. K., Sanza, L. T., Harrison, L. H., Sofair, A. N., Huie-White, S., & Benjamin, D. K.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, P Brian
Venue
Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
2007-03
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
197-200
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2322585225
Cited by
65
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 6
FWCI
6.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (T32AI052080)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K23HD044799, HD044799-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
Keywords
neonatal candidemia, hospital costs, nosocomial bloodstream infection, intensive care nursery, length of hospital stay, cost per day, birth weight, neonatal mortality, Candida, economic burden
MeSH terms
Candidiasis, Connecticut, Female, Hospitals, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Length of Stay, Male, Baltimore, Case-Control Studies, Fungemia, Health Care Costs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review