Cited by 141Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesCOVID-19 and healthcare impacts

The Landscape of Candidemia During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic

Open access
Seagle, Emma E, Jackson, Brendan R, Lockhart, Shawn R, Georgacopoulos, Ourania, Nunnally, Natalie S, Roland, Jeremy, Barter, Devra M, Johnston, Helen L +12 more·2022·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in unprecedented healthcare challenges, and COVID-19 has been linked to secondary infections. Candidemia, a fungal healthcare-associated infection, has been described in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19. However, studies of candidemia and COVID-19 coinfection have been limited in sample size and geographic scope. We assessed differences in patients with candidemia with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. Methods: We conducted a case-level analysis using population-based candidemia surveillance data collected through the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Emerging Infections Program during April–August 2020 to compare characteristics of candidemia patients with and without a positive test for COVID-19 in the 30 days before their Candida culture using chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests. Results: Of the 251 candidemia patients included, 64 (25.5%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2. Liver disease, solid-organ malignancies, and prior surgeries were each >3 times more common in patients without COVID-19 coinfection, whereas intensive care unit–level care, mechanical ventilation, having a central venous catheter, and receipt of corticosteroids and immunosuppressants were each >1.3 times more common in patients with COVID-19. All-cause in-hospital fatality was 2 times higher among those with COVID-19 (62.5%) than without (32.1%). Conclusions: One-quarter of candidemia patients had COVID-19. These patients were less likely to have certain underlying conditions and recent surgery commonly associated with candidemia and more likely to have acute risk factors linked to COVID-19 care, including immunosuppressive medications. Given the high mortality, it is important for clinicians to remain vigilant and take proactive measures to prevent candidemia in patients with COVID-19.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciab562

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Candidemia in patients with COVID-19 but no other underlying comorbidities likely resulted from healthcare-related exposures related to severe COVID-19 infection.

    “Candidemia in these patients with COVID-19 but no other underlying comorbidities likely resulted from healthcare-related exposures related to severe COVID-19 infection.41”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Discussion says candidemia in patients with COVID-19 likely resulted from healthcare exposures associated with severe disease and its medical management. But it says these patients often lacked certain common risk factors and were less likely to have particular underlying conditions—not that they had no other comorbidities. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Changes to healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic and the high acuity of care required for patients with COVID-19 likely contributed to the increased risk of invasive candidiasis among patients with COVID-19.

    “Changes to healthcare systems during the COVID-19 pandemic (eg, lapses in infection control practices, increased antimicrobial prescribing) and the high acuity of care required for patients with COVID-19 infections (eg, invasive devices, long lengths of stay), likely contributed to the increased risk of IC among patients with COVID-19.41,42”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Discussion (page not provided) says that healthcare practices associated with severe COVID-19 and prolonged critical care were likely major contributors to candidemia. The paper also notes greater exposure to antibacterial medications and indwelling devices, but it does not establish lapses in infection control or increased antimicrobial prescribing as contributors; it says the impact of pandemic-related changes in healthcare delivery and infection control was beyond its scope. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The proportion of C. glabrata has increased particularly in the United States, Australia, and Northern Europe.

    “The proportion of C. glabrata has increased particularly in the US, Australia, and Northern Europe.25,40,41,55,61”

    From Epidemiology of Invasive Candidiasis (2024) · cites this paper as [41]

    Table 4 (Historical Comparison; page unavailable) shows a small increase in the proportion of C. glabrata cases in the study’s US cohorts, from 30.3% before the pandemic to 31.5% during it. The paper does not report corresponding trends for Australia or Northern Europe, or establish that the increase was particularly pronounced in those regions. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These findings might reflect the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic because patients with COVID-19-associated infections were more likely to be critically ill and have worse outcomes compared with those without COVID-19.

    “These findings might reflect the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic during this period because patients with COVID-19–associated infections were more likely to be critically ill and have worse outcomes compared with those without COVID-19 (23).”

    From Population-Based Active Surveillance for Culture-Confirmed Candidemia — 10 Sites, United States, 2017–2021 (2025) · cites this paper as [23]

    The Discussion reports that patients with both COVID-19 and candidemia more often received ICU-level care and had approximately twice the case fatality rate of candidemia patients without COVID-19. The source supports the comparison for candidemia, but the citing sentence's broader phrase “COVID-19–associated infections” is not established for other infections. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The increase in older adults likely reflects the occurrence of COVID-19-associated candidemia cases during this time frame because severe COVID-19 more often affects older adults.

    “This finding likely reflects the occurrence of COVID-19–associated candidemia cases during this time frame because severe COVID-19 more often affects older adults (23).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seagle, E. E., Jackson, B. R., Lockhart, S. R., Georgacopoulos, O., Nunnally, N. S., Roland, J., Barter, D. M., Johnston, H. L., Czaja, C. A., Kayalioglu, H., Clogher, P., Revis, A., Farley, M. M., Harrison, L. H., Davis, S. S., Phipps, E. C., Tesini, B. L., Schaffner, W., Markus, T. M., & Lyman, M. M.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • California Emerging Infections Program, Oakland, California, USA
  • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Atlanta Research and Education Foundation (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
Corresponding author
Seagle, Emma E
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2021-06-18
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
802-811
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3170294721
Cited by
141
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 6
FWCI
8.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-RFA-CK17-1701)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Keywords
candidemia, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2 coinfection, fungemia, nosocomial infections, immunosuppression, corticosteroids, mechanical ventilation, intensive care, central venous catheters, in-hospital mortality, risk factors
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Testing, Humans, Candidemia, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review