Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 385

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE OF PEYRONIE’S DISEASE IN A POPULATION OF MEN PRESENTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING

MULHALL, JOHN P., CREECH, STEVEN D., BOORJIAN, STEPHEN A., GHALY, SAM, KIM, EDWARD D., MOTY, AYHAM, DAVIS, RODNEY, HELLSTROM, WAYNE·2004·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study we defined the prevalence of Peyronie's disease in a cohort of men being screened for prostate cancer in the United States. The association between Peyronie's disease, and medical comorbidities and patient self-reported erectile dysfunction was also defined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 534 men presenting to 1 of 3 prostate cancer screening centers provided a complete medical history, underwent physical examination performed in all by a urologist and completed the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) questionnaire. This population was chosen because of the access to a large number of subjects combined with the fact that subjects were not presenting with a specific urological complaint. The diagnosis of Peyronie's disease was based on a palpable penile plaque. Data were assessed using univariate analysis, multivariate logistic regression and Pearson chi-square analysis. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were found to have a palpable penile plaque on physical examination for a prevalence rate of 8.9%. The mean age of men with Peyronie's disease was 68.2 years compared to a mean of 61.8 years in men without Peyronie's disease (p <0.0001). On univariate analysis hypertension (p = 0.02) and diabetes (p = 0.007) were present with significantly increased frequency in patients with Peyronie's disease. Patients diagnosed with Peyronie's disease had significantly lower values for responses to each of the 5 questions on the SHIM survey. An increase in age and decrease in total SHIM score remained significantly associated with a greater probability of Peyronie's disease on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: We found the prevalence of Peyronie's disease to be greater than in most previously reported series. We also noted a significant association between Peyronie's disease aging, hypertension, diabetes and self-reported erectile dysfunction.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ju.0000127744.18878.f1

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. de la Peyronie, 1743, Sur quelques obstacles, qui s'opposent à l'ejaculaction naturelle de la semence, Mem Acad Chir, 1, 318
  2. Lewis, 2002, Surgery for erectile dysfunction, vol. 2, 1673
  3. Jarow, 1997, Penile trauma: an etiologic factor in Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction, J Urol, 158, 1388, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)64222-8 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Somers, 1997, Fibrin deposition in Peyronie's disease plaque, J Urol, 157, 311, 10.1016/S0022-5347(01)65367-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chilton, 1982, Factors associated in the aetiology of Peyronie's disease, Br J Urol, 54, 748, 10.1111/j.1464-410X.1982.tb13640.x · DOI
  6. Carrieri, 1998, A case-control study on risk factors for Peyronie's disease, J Clin Epidemiol, 51, 511, 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00015-8 · DOI
  7. Vande Berg, 1982, Mechanisms of calcification in Peyronie's disease, J Urol, 127, 52, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)53599-5 · DOI
  8. Bias, 1982, Peyronie's disease: a newly recognized autosomal-dominant trait, Am J Med Genet, 12, 227, 10.1002/ajmg.1320120213 · DOI
  9. Gelbard, 1990, The natural history of Peyronie's disease, J Urol, 144, 1376, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)39746-X · DOI · Paper page
  10. Smith, 1969, Subclinical Peyronie's disease, Am J Clin Pathol, 52, 385
  11. Schwarzer, 2001, The prevalence of Peyronie's disease: results of a large survey, BJU Int, 88, 727, 10.1046/j.1464-4096.2001.02436.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rhoden, 2000, Is there any association between Peyronie's disease and serum collagen markers?, Int J Impot Res, 12, 302, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900534 · doi:10.1038/sj.ijir.3900534
  13. Lindsay, 1991, The incidence of Peyronie's disease in Rochester, Minnesota, 1950 through 1984, J Urol, 146, 1007, 10.1016/S0022-5347(17)37988-0 · DOI · Paper page
  14. La Pera, 2001, Peyronie's disease: prevalence and association with cigarette smoking. A multicenter population-based study in men aged 50–69 years, Eur Urol, 40, 525, 10.1159/000049830 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Rhoden, 2001, Prevalence of Peyronie's disease in men over 50-y-old from Southern Brazil, Int J Impot Res, 13, 291, 10.1038/sj.ijir.3900727 · DOI

Cited by

See all 385

Metadata

Authors
MULHALL, J. P., CREECH, S. D., BOORJIAN, S. A., GHALY, S., KIM, E. D., MOTY, A., DAVIS, R., & HELLSTROM, W.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2004-06
Volume
171
Issue
6 Part 1
Pages
2350-2353
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2019425946
Cited by
385
References
1
FWCI
7.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE OF PEYRONIE’S DISEASE IN A POPULATION OF MEN PRESENTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.ju.0000127744.18878.f1
The paper
MULHALL, J. P., CREECH, S. D., BOORJIAN, S. A., GHALY, S., KIM, E. D., MOTY, A., DAVIS, R., & HELLSTROM, W. (2004). SUBJECTIVE AND OBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PREVALENCE OF PEYRONIE’S DISEASE IN A POPULATION OF MEN PRESENTING FOR PROSTATE CANCER SCREENING. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ju.0000127744.18878.f1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.