Cited by 179Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to the British Hypertension Society protocol

Coleman, Andrew, Freeman, Paul, Steel, Stephen, Shennan, Andrew·2006·Blood Pressure Monitoring

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E, Omron Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) is an automated oscillometric upper arm blood pressure monitor for the professional and home use markets. The aim of this study was to validate the accuracy of this device according to the British Hypertension Society and the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation SP10 validation criteria. METHODS: Study participants were recruited until a total of 85 were obtained that filled the blood pressure categories specified by the British Hypertension Society protocol. Recruitment to the study was from the general medical and specialist clinics and from the staff at Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital in London, UK. Nine sequential same-arm blood pressure readings were taken from each participant by two trained observers, alternating between mercury reference sphygmomanometers and the Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E). The differences between the reference and test device readings, for both systolic and diastolic pressures, were compared with British Hypertension Society and Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation criteria to determine the outcome of the study. RESULTS: The Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) is graded 'A' for systolic and 'A' for diastolic blood pressures according to the British Hypertension Society criteria. The mean (standard deviation) of the difference between the observer and the device measurements was 0.60 (6.0) mmHg for systolic and -3.15 (6.6) mmHg for diastolic pressures, respectively. The device, therefore, also satisfies the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation SP10 standard, that requires differences of less than +/-5 (8) mmHg. CONCLUSIONS: The Omron 705IT (HEM-759-E) achieved an 'A/A' performance classification under the British Hypertension Society criteria and passes the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation requirements for the study population. It can be recommended for professional and home-use in an adult population.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mbp.0000189788.05736.5f

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. O'Brien, 2000, Replacing the mercury sphygmomanometer, BMJ, 320, 815, 10.1136/bmj.320.7238.815 · DOI
  2. O'Brien, 1993, The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices, J Hypertens, 11, S2543
  3. O'Brien, 2002, Working Group on blood pressure monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension international protocol for validation of blood pressure devices in adults, Blood Press Monit, 7, 3, 10.1097/00126097-200202000-00002 · DOI
  4. O'Brien, 2003, A web site for blood pressure measuring devices: dableducational.com, Blood Press Monit, 8, 177, 10.1097/00126097-200308000-00010 · DOI
  5. El Assaad, 2003, Evaluation of two devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the international protocol: the Omron M5-I and the Omron 705IT, Blood Press Monit, 8, 127, 10.1097/00126097-200306000-00006 · DOI
  6. Jones, 2000, A validation of the Mobil O Graph (version 12) ambulatory blood pressure monitor, Blood Press Monit, 5, 233, 10.1097/00126097-200008000-00007 · DOI
  7. Cuckson, 2002, Validation of the Microlife BP 3BTO-A oscillometric blood pressure monitoring device according to a modified British Hypertension Society protocol, Blood Press Monit, 7, 319, 10.1097/00126097-200212000-00005 · DOI
  8. Coleman, 2005, The accuracy of the pressure scale of sphygmomanometers in clinical use within primary care, Blood Press Monit, 10, 181, 10.1097/01.mbp.0000168398.87167.c2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Coleman, A., Freeman, P., Steel, S., & Shennan, A.
Affiliations
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Coleman, Andrew
Venue
Blood Pressure Monitoring
Published
2006-02
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
27-32
ISSN
1359-5237 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4230595223
Cited by
179
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood Pressure Monitoring (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
oscillometric blood pressure monitor, British Hypertension Society protocol, home blood pressure monitoring, systolic and diastolic blood pressure
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Blood Pressure Determination, Diastole, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reference Values, Systole, Reproducibility of Results, Blood Pressure Monitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review