Cited by 201Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Hospital length of stay and nutritional status

Kyle, Ursula G, Genton, Laurence, Pichard, Claude·2005·Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care

Abstract

Purpose of review This review looks at the recent medical literature on the association between hospital length of stay and nutritional status. Recent findings Simple anthropometric parameters underestimate the nutritional risk in hospitalized patients. The Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool and Nutritional Risk Screening are simple screening tools that identify patients who require further monitoring. Recent weight loss appears to be the most important single indicator of nutritional status. Body composition measurements identify patients with muscle mass depletion and excess body fat, both of which are significantly associated with increased length of stay. The Subjective Global Assessment is useful at detecting patients with established malnutrition and the Mini Nutritional Assessment for the elderly is useful at detecting patients who need preventive nutritional measures. The Nutritional Risk Index, which incorporates albumin and weight loss, appears to capture both nutritional risk and poor clinical outcome. Summary Nutritional risk is associated with the length of stay in hospital. The choice of nutritional screening and assessment tools depends on the type of institution (university hospital versus community hospital), the patient populations (acute care versus intermediary care; general hospital versus elderly population) and the resources available.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mco.0000172579.94513.db

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The longer the hospital stay, the higher the risk of malnutrition.

    “the longer the hospital stay, the higher the risk of 393 malnutrition [11].”

    From ESPEN guideline on hospital nutrition (2021) · cites this paper as [11]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kyle, U. G., Genton, L., & Pichard, C.
Affiliations
University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Pichard, Claude
Venue
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care
Published
2005-07
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
397-402
ISSN
1363-1950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2051425418
Cited by
201
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
length of hospital stay, nutritional status, nutritional risk, malnutrition screening, Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool, nutritional risk screening, weight loss, body composition, muscle mass loss, Subjective Global Assessment, Mini Nutritional Assessment, nutritional risk index, serum albumin, hospitalized patients
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Humans, Length of Stay, Nutritional Status, Weight Loss, Nutrition Assessment, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review