Cited by 2,161Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyBody Composition Measurement Techniques

The mini nutritional assessment (MNA) and its use in grading the nutritional state of elderly patients

Vellas, Bruno, Guigoz, Yves, Garry, Philip J, Nourhashemi, Fati, Bennahum, David, Lauque, Sylvie, Albarede, Jean-Louis·1999·Nutrition

Abstract

The Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) has recently been designed and validated to provide a single, rapid assessment of nutritional status in elderly patients in outpatient clinics, hospitals, and nursing homes. It has been translated into several languages and validated in many clinics around the world. The MNA test is composed of simple measurements and brief questions that can be completed in about 10 min. Discriminant analysis was used to compare the findings of the MNA with the nutritional status determined by physicians, using the standard extensive nutritional assessment including complete anthropometric, clinical biochemistry, and dietary parameters. The sum of the MNA score distinguishes between elderly patients with: 1) adequate nutritional status, MNA > or = 24; 2) protein-calorie malnutrition, MNA < 17; 3) at risk of malnutrition, MNA between 17 and 23.5. With this scoring, sensitivity was found to be 96%, specificity 98%, and predictive value 97%. The MNA scale was also found to be predictive of mortality and hospital cost. Most important it is possible to identify people at risk for malnutrition, scores between 17 and 23.5, before severe changes in weight or albumin levels occur. These individuals are more likely to have a decrease in caloric intake that can be easily corrected by nutritional intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00171-3

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ESPEN recommended the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in community settings, the Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) in clinical settings, and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for the elderly.

    “ESPEN recommended the use of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool (MUST) in community settings (48), the Nutritional Risk Screening tool (NRS-2002) in clinical settings (49), and the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) for the elderly (50).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vellas, B., Guigoz, Y., Garry, P. J., Nourhashemi, F., Bennahum, D., Lauque, S., & Albarede, J.-L.
Affiliations
  • Nestlé (Switzerland) (CH)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Guigoz, Yves
Venue
Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1999-02
Volume
15
Issue
2
Pages
116-122
ISSN
0899-9007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082755106
Cited by
2,161
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 140 · 2025: 172 · 2024: 159 · 2023: 159 · 2022: 157 · 2021: 134 · 2020: 174 · 2019: 109 · 2018: 103 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 72 · 2015: 75 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 79 · 2012: 70
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
Mini Nutritional Assessment, nutritional assessment, elderly patients, malnutrition, protein-energy malnutrition, nutritional screening, mortality prediction, hospital costs, dietary intervention
MeSH terms
Aged, Aging, Anthropometry, Diet, Geriatrics, Humans, Nutrition Disorders, Nutritional Status, Perception, Nutrition Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review