The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Prospective Multicenter Study of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Incidence of Endocarditis, Risk Factors for Mortality, and Clinical Impact of Methicillin Resistance
Abstract
Our objectives were to determine the incidence of endocarditis in patients whose Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia was community-acquired, related to hemodialysis, or hospital-acquired; to assess clinical factors that would reliably distinguished between S. aureus bacteremia and S. aureus endocarditis; to assess the emergence of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) as a cause of endocarditis; and to examine risk factors for mortality in patients with S. aureus endocarditis. We conducted a prospective observational study in 6 university teaching hospitals; we evaluated 505 consecutive patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. Thirteen percent of patients with S. aureus bacteremia were found to have endocarditis, including 21% with community-acquired S. aureus bacteremia, 5% with hospital-acquired bacteremia, and 12% on hemodialysis. Infection was due to MRSA in 31%. Factors predictive of endocarditis included underlying valvular heart disease, history of prior endocarditis, intravenous drug use, community acquisition of bacteremia, and an unrecognized source. Twelve patients with bacteremia had a prosthetic valve; 17% developed endocarditis. Unexpectedly, nonwhite race proved to be an independent risk factor for endocarditis by both univariate and multivariate analyses. Persistent bacteremia (positive blood cultures at day 3 of appropriate therapy) was identified as an independent risk factor for both endocarditis and mortality, a unique observation not reported in other prospective studies of S. aureus bacteremia. Patients with endocarditis due to MRSA were significantly more likely to have complicating renal insufficiency and to experience persistent bacteremia than those with endocarditis due to MSSA. The 30-day mortality was 31% among patients with endocarditis compared to 21% in patients who had bacteremia without endocarditis (p = 0.055). Risk factors for death due to endocarditis included severity of illness at onset of bacteremia (as measured by Apache III and Pitt bacteremia score), MRSA infection, and presence of atrioventricular block on electrocardiogram. Patients with S. aureus bacteremia who have community acquisition of infection, underlying valvular heart disease, intravenous drug use, unknown portal of entry, history of prior endocarditis, and possibly, nonwhite race should undergo echocardiography to screen for the presence of endocarditis. We recommend that blood cultures be repeated 3 days following initiation of antistaphylococcal antibiotic therapy in all patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Positive blood cultures at 3 days may prove to be a useful marker in promoting more aggressive management, including more potent antibiotic therapy and surgical resection of the valve in endocarditis cases. MRSA as the infecting organism should be added to the list of risk factors for consideration of valvular resection in cases of endocarditis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tenover, F. C., Arbeit, R. D., Goering, R. V., Mickelsen, P. A., Murray, B. E., Persing, D. H., & Swaminathan, B. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.33.9.2233-2239.1995 · Cited by 8,204
CDC definitions for nosocomial infections, 1988
Garner, J. S., Jarvis, W. R., Emori, T. G., Horan, T. C., & Hughes, J. M. (1988) · American Journal of Infection Control · doi:10.1016/0196-6553(88)90053-3 · Cited by 5,672
Proposed Modifications to the Duke Criteria for the Diagnosis of Infective Endocarditis
Li, J. S., Sexton, D. J., Mick, N., Nettles, R., Fowler, V. G., Ryan, T., Bashore, T., & Corey, G. R. (2000) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/313753 · Cited by 4,027
The APACHE III Prognostic System
Knaus, W. A., Wagner, D. P., Draper, E. A., Zimmerman, J. E., Bergner, M., Bastos, P. G., Sirio, C. A., Murphy, D. J., Lotring, T., Damiano, A., et al. (1991) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.100.6.1619 · Cited by 3,439
The APACHE III Prognostic System
Teres, D., & Lemeshow, S. (1992) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.102.6.1919b · Cited by 2,880
Durack, D. T., Lukes, A. S., Bright, D. K., & Service, D. E. (1994) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(94)90143-0 · Cited by 2,572
A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related Infection
Maki, D. G., Weise, C. E., & Sarafin, H. W. (1977) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197706092962301 · Cited by 2,027
Levine, D. P., Fromm, B. S., & Reddy, B. R. (1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-115-9-674 · Cited by 577
Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis as a replacement for bacteriophage typing of Staphylococcus aureus
Bannerman, T. L., Hancock, G. A., Tenover, F. C., & Miller, J. M. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.33.3.551-555.1995 · Cited by 550
Chang, F.-Y., Peacock, J. E., Musher, D. M., Triplett, P., MacDonald, B. B., Mylotte, J. M., O’Donnell, A., Wagener, M. M., & Yu, V. L. (2003) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.md.0000091184.93122.09 · Cited by 530
Self-citation
Cited by
Mermel, L. A., Allon, M., Bouza, E., Craven, D. E., Flynn, P., O'Grady, N. P., Raad, I. I., Rijnders, B. J. A., Sherertz, R. J., & Warren, D. K. (2009) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/599376 · Cited by 3,638
Daptomycin versus Standard Therapy for Bacteremia and Endocarditis Caused by Staphylococcus aureus
Fowler, V. G., Boucher, H. W., Corey, G. R., Abrutyn, E., Karchmer, A. W., Rupp, M. E., Levine, D. P., Chambers, H. F., Tally, F. P., Vigliani, G. A., et al. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa053783 · Cited by 1,459
Predictors of Mortality in Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia
van Hal, S. J., Jensen, S. O., Vaska, V. L., Espedido, B. A., Paterson, D. L., & Gosbell, I. B. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.05022-11 · Cited by 932
Tacconelli, E., De Angelis, G., Cataldo, M. A., Pozzi, E., & Cauda, R. (2007) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkm416 · Cited by 435
Staphylococcus aureus Small‐Colony Variants Are Adapted Phenotypes for Intracellular Persistence
Tuchscherr, L., Heitmann, V., Hussain, M., Viemann, D., Roth, J., von Eiff, C., Peters, G., Becker, K., & Löffler, B. (2010) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/656047 · Cited by 275
Metadata
- Authors
- Chang, F.-Y., MacDonald, B. B., Peacock, J. E., Musher, D. M., Triplett, P., Mylotte, J. M., O’Donnell, A., Wagener, M. M., & Yu, V. L.
- Venue
- Medicine
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 322-332
- ISSN
- 0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013423572
- Cited by
- 349
- References
- 71
- FWCI
- 8.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Multicenter Study of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Incidence of Endocarditis, Risk Factors for Mortality, and Clinical Impact of Methicillin Resistance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.md.0000091185.93122.40
- The paper
- Chang, F.-Y., MacDonald, B. B., Peacock, J. E., Musher, D. M., Triplett, P., Mylotte, J. M., O’Donnell, A., Wagener, M. M., & Yu, V. L. (2003). A Prospective Multicenter Study of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Incidence of Endocarditis, Risk Factors for Mortality, and Clinical Impact of Methicillin Resistance. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.md.0000091185.93122.40
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.