The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Innovative approach to low-level gluten determination in foods using a novel sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: There is currently much call for a reliable enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) protocol for determining gluten in foods to serve as a basis for further Codex Alimentarius regulations. Given its ability to recognize the potential coeliac-toxic epitope QQPFP, which occurs repeatedly in alpha-, gamma- and omega-gliadins, hordeins and secalins, the monoclonal antibody R5 raised against a secalin extract may prove to be an essential tool for gluten analysis. This study was designed to develop a highly sensitive and specific sandwich ELISA to quantify low levels of wheat, barley and rye prolamins in foods for coeliacs. METHODS: Simple sandwich ELISA based on the use of a single monoclonal antibody (R5) as both the coating and detection was developed. A quantitative cocktail gluten-extraction procedure for heat-processed foods was also tested. RESULTS: R5-ELISA was able to identify gliadins, hordeins and secalins with assay sensitivities of 0.78, 0.39 and 0.39 ng/ml, respectively. The assay's detection limit was 1.5 ng gliadins/ml (1.56 ppm gliadins, 3.2 ppm gluten). The system proved insensitive to the non-coeliac-toxic cereals maize, rice and oats, and was non-cultivar-dependent. It was also able to detect gliadins and hordeins in unprocessed and heat-processed wheat- and barley-based products, and to estimate the gluten content of hydrolysed foods. CONCLUSION: We present a new generation of a robust sandwich R5-ELISA with good reproducibility (8.7%) and repeatability (7.7%). Its gluten-detection limit of 3.2 ppm is lower than the existing threshold of 20-200 ppm. The ELISA, which is equally sensitive to barley, wheat and rye prolamins, is compatible with the quantitative cocktail extraction procedure for heat-processed foods. Along with the cocktail procedure, the Working Group on Prolamin Analysis and Toxicity is currently evaluating an R5-ELISA system as proposed by the Codex Alimentarius Commission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Low‐gluten, nontransgenic wheat engineered with CRISPR/Cas9
Sánchez‐León, S., Gil‐Humanes, J., Ozuna, C. V., Giménez, M. J., Sousa, C., Voytas, D. F., & Barro, F. (2018) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.12837 · Cited by 587
Determination of food authenticity by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
Asensio, L., González, I., García, T., & Martín, R. (2008) · Food Control · doi:10.1016/j.foodcont.2007.02.010 · Cited by 414
Dietary guidelines and implementation for celiac disease
Kupper, C. (2005) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.02.024 · Cited by 364
The Gluten-Free Diet: Testing Alternative Cereals Tolerated by Celiac Patients
Comino, I., De Lourdes Moreno, M., Real, A., Rodríguez-Herrera, A., Barro, F., & Sousa, C. (2013) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu5104250 · Cited by 102
Gluten Contamination in Naturally or Labeled Gluten-Free Products Marketed in Italy
Verma, A., Gatti, S., Galeazzi, T., Monachesi, C., Padella, L., Baldo, G., Annibali, R., Lionetti, E., & Catassi, C. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9020115 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Valdés, I., García, E., Llorente, M., & Méndez, E.
- Venue
- European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology
- Published
- 2003-05
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 465-747
- ISSN
- 0954-691X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024693912
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Innovative approach to low-level gluten determination in foods using a novel sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.meg.0000059119.41030.df
- The paper
- Valdés, I., García, E., Llorente, M., & Méndez, E. (2003). Innovative approach to low-level gluten determination in foods using a novel sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay protocol. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.meg.0000059119.41030.df
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.