Cited by 289Vestibular and auditory disordersHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsHearing Loss and Rehabilitation

Intratympanic dexamethasone for sudden sensorineural hearing loss after failure of systemic therapy

Haynes, David S., O'Malley, Matthew, Cohen, Seth, Watford, Kenneth, Labadie, Robert F.·2007·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objective Intratympanic steroids are increasingly used in the treatment of inner ear disorders, especially in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who have failed systemic therapy. We reviewed our experience with intratympanic steroids in the treatment of patients with sudden SNHL to determine overall success, morbidity, and prognostic factors. Hypothesis Intratympanic steroids have minimal morbidity and the potential to have a positive effect on hearing recovery in patients with sudden SNHL who have failed systemic therapy. Study design The authors conducted a retrospective review. Methods Patients presenting with sudden SNHL defined as a rapid decline in hearing over 3 days or less affecting 3 or more frequencies by 30 dB or greater who underwent intratympanic steroids therapy (24 mg/mL dexamethasone) were reviewed. Excluded were patients with Meniere disease, retrocochlear disease, autoimmune HL, trauma, fluctuating HL, radiation-induced HL, noise-induced HL, or any other identifiable etiology for sudden HL. Patients who showed signs of fluctuation of hearing after injection were excluded. Pretreatment and posttreatment audiometric evaluations including pure-tone average (PTA) and speech reception threshold (SRT) were analyzed. Patient variables as they related to recovery were studied and included patient age, time to onset of therapy, status of the contralateral ear, presence of diabetes, severity of HL, and presence of associated symptoms (tinnitus, ve…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000245058.11866.15

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haynes, D. S., O'Malley, M., Cohen, S., Watford, K., & Labadie, R. F.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Haynes, David S.
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-01
Volume
117
Issue
1
Pages
3-15
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2000821511
Cited by
289
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 25
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Keywords
sudden sensorineural hearing loss, intratympanic dexamethasone, intratympanic steroids, hearing recovery, pure-tone average, speech reception threshold, time to treatment, diabetes mellitus, tinnitus, vertigo, treatment morbidity, prognostic factors, inner ear disorders, steroid injection complications
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Audiometry, Dexamethasone, Female, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Tympanic Membrane, Multivariate Analysis, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review