Cited by 74Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety

Microfabricated reciprocating micropump for intracochlear drug delivery with integrated drug/fluid storage and electronically controlled dosing

Open access
Tandon, Vishal, Kang, Woo Seok, Robbins, Tremaan A., Spencer, Abigail J., Kim, Ernest S., McKenna, Michael J., Kujawa, Sharon G., Fiering, Jason +4 more·2016·Lab on a Chip

Abstract

We fabricated a micropump for reciprocating, zero-net-volume intracochlear drug delivery.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1039/c5lc01396h

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The battery had a stretchability of 300% with a capacity density of approximately 1.1 mAh cm−2.

    “The battery had a stretchability of 300% with a capacity density of ≈1.1 mAh cm−2 (Figure 8 a).”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [187]

    The Methods (§2.1) describe a flexible membrane and fluidic capacitors in a micropump; the Results (§3.1) report fluid-delivery performance. Searches for battery stretchability, 300%, and capacity density found no passage in our copy addressing the claimed battery measurements. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A wireless charging system was designed with 1 mm spaced coils, where the received power by the receiving coil was 9.2 mW, showing a DC output of 3.0 V with an efficiency of 4.9%.

    “A wireless charging system was designed with 1 mm spaced coils, where the received power by the receiving coil was 9.2 mW, showing a DC output of 3.0 V with an efficiency of 4.9%.187”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [187]

    Methods §2.3 says the experimental controller was connected by cable and powered from a wall outlet. Our copy does not address a wireless charging system or report the claimed coil spacing, received power, DC output, or efficiency (searched for wireless charging, receiving coils, and those values). (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A rechargeable Li-ion battery has been fabricated from low-modulus silicone elastomers as substrates, segmented active components, and interconnected structures.

    “A rechargeable Li‐ion battery has been fabricated from low‐modulus silicone elastomers as substrates, segmented active components, and interconnected structures.187”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [187]

    The Methods (sections 2.2–2.3; page unavailable) describe materials and fabrication of a drug-delivery micropump, not a rechargeable Li-ion battery. Searches for Li-ion batteries, silicone elastomer substrates, and segmented active components found no passage addressing the claimed battery fabrication. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Juhn SK Hunter BA Odland RM Int Tinnitus J 2001 7 72 83 14689642
  2. [18]Pararas EEL Chen Z Fiering J Mescher MJ Kim ES McKenna MJ Kujawa SG Borenstein JT Sewell WF J Control Release 2011 152 270 277 21385596 PMC3114251
  3. [35]Agranoff BW Fed Proc 1975 34 1911 1914 239869
  4. [38]Böhmer A Andrews JC Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1989 246 65 66 2735833

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tandon, V., Kang, W. S., Robbins, T. A., Spencer, A. J., Kim, E. S., McKenna, M. J., Kujawa, S. G., Fiering, J., Pararas, E. E. L., Mescher, M. J., Sewell, W. F., & Borenstein, J. T.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary (US)
  • Materials Engineering and Microfabrication Directorate
Corresponding author
Borenstein, Jeffrey T.
Venue
Lab on a Chip
Published
2016
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
829-846
ISSN
  • 1473-0189 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0197
OpenAlex
W2205058162
Cited by
73
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 13 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Lab on a Chip (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (5 R01 DC006848-08)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Intravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Keywords
intracochlear drug delivery, cochlear fluid, hair cell regeneration, implantable drug delivery, DNQX, compound action potential, glutamate receptor antagonists, guinea pig model, hearing disorders
MeSH terms
Animals, Cochlea, Guinea Pigs, Humans, Infusion Pumps, Drug Delivery Systems, Microfluidic Analytical Techniques, Lab-On-A-Chip Devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review