Cited by 160Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

Distress in Spouses and Patients After Treatment for Head and Neck Cancer

Verdonck‐de Leeuw, Irma M., Eerenstein, Simone E., Van der Linden, Mecheline H., Kuik, Dirk J., de Bree, Remco, Leemans, C. Rene·2007·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Background: The objective of this study is to obtain insight into distress in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. Methods: Forty‐one patient–spouse pairs completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Inclusion criteria included curative treatment for head and neck cancer. Exclusion criteria were visiting the clinic without a spouse, bad news at the routine follow‐up examination, diseases causing cognitive dysfunction, and poor understanding of the Dutch language. Next to the HADS, the assessment protocol included age, gender, health status, coping strategy, time since cancer treatment, tumor stage and site, treatment modality, functional and social impairment, and caregiving burden. Results: A clinical level of distress was noted in 20% of the spouses and in 27% of the patients. Distress in spouses was related to the presence of a feeding tube in patients, a passive coping style, less vitality, and a disrupted daily life schedule resulting from caregiving. Distress in patients was related to the presence of a feeding tube, speech and swallowing problems, less social contacts, a passive style of coping, and nonexpression of emotions. Conclusion: Distress is often present in spouses and patients treated for head and neck cancer. Routine screening for psychologic distress is recommended.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.mlg.0000250169.10241.58

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verdonck‐de Leeuw, I. M., Eerenstein, S. E., Van der Linden, M. H., Kuik, D. J., de Bree, R., & Leemans, C. R.
Affiliations
Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
238-241
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2103995559
Cited by
160
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 11
FWCI
5.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
head and neck cancer, psychological distress, spouses, caregivers, anxiety, depression, coping styles, feeding tube, dysphagia, speech disorders, caregiver burden, emotional expression
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Anxiety, Carcinoma, Deglutition Disorders, Depression, Emotions, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Health Status, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Sex Factors, Social Behavior, Speech Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review