Blood donor complications after whole-blood donation
Abstract
Purpose of review This review focuses on the common and uncommon adverse events that occur during or after whole-blood donation. The incidence of seeking outside medical care for an adverse event is at least 1 in 3400 blood donations. Physicians may encounter blood donors with adverse events and should be familiar with their prognosis and treatment. Recent findings There are 15 million whole-blood donations per year in the United States, and one third of the donors develop one or more adverse events. A recent study defined the common complications based on a postdonation interview as bruise (23%), sore arm (10%), fatigue (80/%), and vasovagal reaction (7%). A 2003 American Red Cross national donor complication database from 7,000,000 whole-blood donations classified reported donor complications and the incidence of outside medical care. Descriptive studies have been published on vasovagal syncopal reactions, antecubital nerve injuries (irritations), and arterial punctures, and the medical outcomes for these entities have been more precisely defined. The effect of blood donor adverse events on donor retention rates is a new area that is just beginning to be studied. Summary The incidence of complications and types of complications is more precisely defined today. Medical outcomes are better defined for vasovagal reactions, nerve injuries (irritations), and arterial puncture. These data should help physicians who encounter these entities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Trouern‐Trend, J. J., Cable, R. G., Badon, S. J., Newman, B. H., & Popovsky, M. A. (1999) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1999.39399219291.x · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Self-citationNewman, B. H., Pichette, S., Pichette, D., & Dzaka, E. (2003) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2003.00368.x · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Self-citationDonor reactions and injuries from whole blood donation
Newman, B. H. (1997) · Transfusion Medicine Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0887-7963(97)80011-9 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Self-citationNewman, B. H., & Waxman, D. A. (1996) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36396182137.x · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Self-citationA Study of Criteria for Blood Donor Deferral
Tomasulo, P. A., Anderson, A. J., Paluso, M. B., Gutschenritter, M. A., & Aster, R. H. (1980) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.1980.20581034503.x · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Horowitz, S. H. (2000) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40091036.x · Cited by 85 · see citing works
A study of 178 consecutive vasovagal syncopal reactions from the perspective of safety
Newman, B. H., & Graves, S. (2001) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41121475.x · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Self-citationVenipuncture nerve injuries after whole-blood donation.
Newman, B. (2001) · Transfusion · doi:10.1046/j.1537-2995.2001.41040571.x · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schulzki, T., Seidel, K., Storch, H., Karges, H., Kiessig, S., Schneider, S., Taborski, U., Wolter, K., Steppat, D., Behm, E., et al. (2006) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00794.x · Cited by 76 · see citing works
What happens when cutaneous nerves are injured during venipuncture?
Horowitz, S. H. (2005) · Muscle & Nerve · doi:10.1002/mus.20287 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Waller, D., Mondy, P., Brama, T., Fisher, J., King, A., Malkov, K., Wall‐Smith, D., Ryan, L., & Irving, D. O. (2016) · Vox Sanguinis · doi:10.1111/vox.12407 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Savaliya, S. M., Singh, A. P., & Piparva, K. G. (2019) · International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20192647 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
ADVERSE EVENTS IN BLOOD DONORS: SPECTRUM AND REMEDY
Bhushan, R., Gupta, P., Mehra, A., & Iyengar, S. (2023) · PARIPEX-Indian Journal of Research · doi:10.36106/paripex/1800303
- Authors
- Newman, B. H.
- Affiliations
- American Red Cross (US)
- Corresponding author
- Newman, Bruce H
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Hematology
- Published
- 2004-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 339-345
- ISSN
- 1065-6251 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2118868365
- Cited by
- 77
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Current Opinion in Hematology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering
- Keywords
- whole blood donation, adverse events, vasovagal syncope, arterial puncture, bruising, fatigue, donor retention
- MeSH terms
- Blood Donors, Blood Specimen Collection, Contusions, Fatigue, Humans, Pain, Wounds and Injuries, Databases, Factual, Syncope, Vasovagal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review