Cited by 2Blood donation and transfusion practicesBlood transfusion and managementEthics in Clinical Research

A donor hemovigilance study: Evaluation of adverse reactions to blood donors at tertiary care teaching hospital

Open access
Savaliya, Sheetal M., Singh, Anil P., Piparva, Kiran G.·2019·International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: Donor hemovigilance is an important aspect of the hemovigilance system and contributes to decrease the blood donor’s complications and improving blood donor safety and functioning of blood bank. Reporting of adverse reactions associated with blood donations has been covered under National blood donor vigilance programme. This study was carried out to estimate the adverse events in blood donors and to promote their safety.Methods: The study was conducted over a period of 6 months, from 1st January 2017 to 30th June 2017 after getting approval from institutional ethics committee at tertiary care teaching hospital. Prior informed consent was obtained and donor confidentiality was ensured. The donors were observed for adverse event during or after donation. For delayed reactions, donors were requested to contact the researcher or designated departmental staff. Data was collected in case record form. Data entry was done in excel 2013 and appropriate Statistical test (chi square) was applied.Results: During study period total 7970 donors were registered, out of which 53.27% donors have donated their blood in blood camps and 46.72% have in blood bank. Incidence of donor reactions was 1.54%. Incidence of adverse reaction was higher at blood camps (58.53%). Authors found highest number of cases of mild vaso vagal type reactions (53%). Other types of reactions observed were painful arm, hematoma, delayed bleeding, tingling and moderate type of vaso vagal reaction.Conclusions: Authors did not find any major serious events like convulsion, thrombophlebitis or arterial puncture during study period. It considers that safety of donors was maintained.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.18203/2319-2003.ijbcp20192647

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [1]1. Das SC. Donors Hemovigilance: An Institutional Study. Int J Sci Res. 2016;6(5):203-6.
  2. [4]4. Harkin R, Lessig M. Reaction incidence among teen- aged first time and repeat whole blood and apheresis donors. Transfusion. 2007;47(3):105A.
  3. [5]5. Eder AF, Dy BA, Kennedy JM, Notari IV EP, Strupp A, Wissel ME, et al. The American Red Cross Donor Hemovigilance program, complications of donation reported in 2006. Transfusion. 2008;48(9):1809-19.
  4. [6]6. Caffrey EA, Butler M, Bissell L, Bowden M, Fry R. Establishing a national adverse event reporting system for blood donors-a prospective study of 1.8 million attendances in England and North Wales. Vox Sang. 2005;1:109-14.
  5. [8]8. Newman BH. Vasovagal reactions and body weight: findings in high and low risk populations. Transfusion. 2003;43(8):1084-88.
  6. [9]9. Horowitz SH. Venipuncture-induced nerve injury: a review. J Neuropathic Pain Symptom Palliation. 2005;1(1):109-14.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Savaliya, S. M., Singh, A. P., & Piparva, K. G.
Venue
International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology
Publisher
Medip Academy
Published
2019-06-24
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1538
ISSN
  • 2279-0780 (ISSN-L)
  • 2319-2003
OpenAlex
W2954821117
Cited by
2
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
International Journal of Basic & Clinical Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
blood donor safety, hematoma, delayed bleeding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review