The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review the current evidence on the use of infection markers for diagnostic evaluation of sepsis in neonates. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent research in immunology has led to the discovery of cell surface antigens, chemokines, cytokines and acute phase proteins that can potentially be used to 'rule in' or 'rule out' sepsis. The diagnostic utilities of key inflammatory mediators, including CD11b, CD64, interleukin-6 and interleukin-8, are promising and likely to become increasingly used as markers of infection for both diagnostic and prognostic purposes. SUMMARY: Serial measurements and use of combinations of markers have been reported to improve sensitivity and negative predictive value of these tests. Current markers are not infallible, however, and do not permit neonatologists to withhold antibiotics in sick infants with suspected infection. Thus, many have emerged as useful indicators for early discontinuation of unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. Some infection markers are also useful for identifying infants with severe infection and adverse prognosis. Advances in flow cytometry have allowed simultaneous measurement of key markers using only minimal blood volume. Judicious selection of a panel of markers with complementary properties could greatly increase the ability of neonatologists to diagnose infection and discern valuable prognostic information.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pierrakos, C., & Vincent, J.-L. (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc8872 · Cited by 1,377
Kuppala, V. S., Meinzen-Derr, J., Morrow, A. L., & Schibler, K. R. (2011) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2011.05.033 · Cited by 613
New Approaches to Sepsis: Molecular Diagnostics and Biomarkers
Reinhart, K., Bauer, M., Riedemann, N. C., & Hartog, C. S. (2012) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00016-12 · Cited by 533
Antibiotic stewardship in neonates: challenges and opportunities
Ting, J. Y., & Shah, P. S. (2020) · Translational Pediatrics · doi:10.21037/tp-20-134 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Ng, P. C., & Lam, H. S.
- Venue
- Current Opinion in Pediatrics
- Published
- 2006-04
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 125-131
- ISSN
- 1040-8703 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971575846
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/01.mop.0000193293.87022.4c
- The paper
- Ng, P. C., & Lam, H. S. (2006). Diagnostic markers for neonatal sepsis. Current Opinion in Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mop.0000193293.87022.4c
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.