Cited by 131Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationMethodologies in Health Research and Practice

Theory and Knowledge Translation: Setting Some Coordinates

Rycroft-Malone, Jo·2007·Nursing Research

Abstract

In a healthcare context in which research evidence is not used routinely in practice, there have been increasingly loud calls for the use of theory from investigators working in the field of knowledge translation. Implementation researchers argue that theory should be used to guide the design of testable and practical intervention strategies, and thus, contribute to generalizable knowledge about implementation interventions. The purpose of this commentary is to critique model papers writing by a team of scholars who aimed to disentangle some of the relationships determining research utilization, by scrutinizing an existing conceptual framework that acknowledges, along with other factors, the importance of contextual factors in knowledge translation. These papers are used as a vehicle to explore theory application in knowledge translation research. As theory use and development is in its infancy, some key issues, including different ideological perspectives, factors for and against theory use, ensuring conceptual clarity, selecting coherent overarching frameworks, and choosing appropriately among theories, are considered. Finally, an agenda for theory-informed research is outlined, which highlights the need for scholarly, pluralistic, and collaborative activity if the state of knowledge translation science is to advance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.nnr.0000280631.48407.9b

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rycroft-Malone, J.
Venue
Nursing Research
Published
2007-07
Volume
56
Issue
4
Pages
S78-S85
ISSN
0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027367308
Cited by
131
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
18.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Methodologies in Health Research and Practice
Keywords
knowledge translation, theory application, implementation research, research utilization, contextual factors, conceptual framework, theory choice, implementation strategies, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Leadership, Models, Psychological, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Nursing Theory, Philosophy, Nursing, Research Design, Organizational Culture, Nursing Research, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Models, Organizational, Evidence-Based Medicine, Knowledge, Information Dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review