Cited by 623Health Sciences Research and EducationHealth Policy Implementation ScienceClinical practice guidelines implementation

An exploration of the factors that influence the implementation of evidence into practice

Rycroft‐Malone, Jo, Harvey, Gill, Seers, Kate, Kitson, Alison, McCormack, Brendan, Titchen, Angie·2004·Journal of Clinical Nursing

Abstract

Background. The challenges of implementing evidence‐based practice are complex and varied. Against this background a framework has been developed to represent the multiple factors that may influence the implementation of evidence into practice. It is proposed that successful implementation is dependent upon the nature of the evidence being used, the quality of context, and, the type of facilitation required to enable the change process. This study sets out to scrutinize the elements of the framework through empirical enquiry. Aims and objectives. The aim of the study was to address the following questions: • What factors do practitioners identify as the most important in enabling implementation of evidence into practice? • What are the factors practitioners identify that mediate the implementation of evidence into practice? • Do the concepts of evidence, context and facilitation constitute the key elements of a framework for getting evidence into practice? Design and methods. The study was conducted in two phases. Phase 1: Exploratory focus groups (n = 2) were conducted to inform the development of an interview guide. This was used with individual key informants in case study sites. Phase 2: Two sites with on‐going or recent implementation projects were studied. Within sites semi‐structured interviews were conducted (n = 17). Results. A number of key issues in relation to the implementation of evidence into practice emerged including: the nature and role of evidence, relevance and fit with organizational and practice issues, multi‐professional relationships and collaboration, role of the project lead and resources. Conclusions. The results are discussed with reference to the wider literature and in relation to the on‐going development of the framework. Crucially the growing body of evidence reveals that a focus on individual approaches to implementing evidence‐based practice, such as skilling‐up practitioners to appraise research evidence, will be ineffective by themselves. Relevance to clinical practice. Key elements that require attention in implementing evidence into practice are presented and may provide a useful checklist for future implementation and evaluation projects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01007.x

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rycroft‐Malone, J., Harvey, G., Seers, K., Kitson, A., McCormack, B., & Titchen, A.
Affiliations
  • Royal College of Nursing (GB)
  • University of Ulster (GB)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-11
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
913-924
ISSN
  • 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2702
OpenAlex
W2137286012
Cited by
623
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 43
FWCI
50.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
evidence-based practice, implementation of evidence, implementation framework, context, facilitation, organizational change, interprofessional collaboration, implementation resources, research appraisal skills, nursing practice
MeSH terms
Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Nursing Care, Professional Practice, Social Facilitation, Focus Groups, Evidence-Based Medicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review