Cited by 32HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

Postexposure prophylaxis for HIV in children and adolescents after sexual assault: a prospective observational study in an urban medical center.

Neu, Natalie, Heffernan-Vacca, Susan, Millery, Mari, Stimell, Mindy, Brown, Jocelyn·2007·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We sought to evaluate the tolerability and feasibility of establishing an HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) program at our hospital using the guidelines for children and adolescents after sexual assault. METHODS: This study was a prospective, nonrandomized observational study conducted from March 1999 until September 2002. Subjects (age <19 years) who presented to a pediatric emergency room within 72 hours of a sexual assault were eligible for enrollment. A 28-day PEP regimen of zidovudine and lamivudine was given. RESULTS: In all, 70 adolescents were evaluated and 33 (31 females and 2 males) were enrolled. The mean age of enrolled subjects was 15 years, 61% were Hispanic, 30% black, and 79% presented to the emergency room within 24 hours of assault. Vaginal exposure was the most common site of penetration (64% [21 of 33]), but 18% (6 of 33) reported anal penetration. Only 9 subjects (27%) took >or=90% of all the medications. All subjects who returned for follow up tested HIV-negative. Adverse events occurred in 48% (16 of 33) of subjects; the most common events were abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting. CONCLUSION: Poor adherence to medications and visits is a significant problem in PEP programs for sexually assaulted children and adolescents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.olq.0000225329.07765.d8

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neu, N., Heffernan-Vacca, S., Millery, M., Stimell, M., & Brown, J.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Neu, Natalie
  • Brown, Jocelyn
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2007-02
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
65-68
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029727263
Cited by
32
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, sexual assault, children and adolescents, zidovudine, lamivudine, medication adherence, adverse events, HIV prevention, emergency department, program feasibility
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Drug Combinations, Female, HIV, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, New York City, Patient Compliance, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Sex Offenses, Zidovudine, HIV Infections, Lamivudine, Anti-HIV Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review