Cited by 41HIV/AIDS Research and InterventionsAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive HealthSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

HIV postexposure prophylaxis use among Ontario female adolescent sexual assault victims: a prospective analysis.

Du Mont, Janice, Myhr, Terri L., Husson, Heather, Macdonald, Sheila, Rachlis, Anita, Loutfy, Mona R.·2008·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study examined the use of HIV postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) among sexually assaulted adolescent females. METHODS: We analyzed data from the HIV PEP Project, an implementation and evaluation of a program of universal offering of PEP to sexual assault victims of all ages. Baseline and follow-up data were collected prospectively from consecutive clients seen at 18 hospital-based sexual assault treatment centers in Ontario, Canada from September 2003 to January 2005. Among 386 at-risk female adolescents, we examined the provision and uptake of and adherence to PEP, and factors related to antiretroviral acceptance and completion. RESULTS: Most adolescents were single (94.5%), living with family (68.0%), and attending school (67.4%). Slightly over two-fifths (42.7%) accepted and one-third (33.6%) completed the 28-day course of PEP. Factors associated with PEP acceptance were health care provider encouragement, being a student, and being moderately-to-highly anxious. PEP completion was associated with being white and an assailant known less than 24 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of the health care provider's role in counseling sexually assaulted female adolescents about HIV PEP use. The results also suggest that at-risk adolescents not enrolled in school and those from culturally diverse backgrounds may require additional supports.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/olq.0b013e3181824f3c

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Du Mont, J., Myhr, T. L., Husson, H., Macdonald, S., Rachlis, A., & Loutfy, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Women's College Hospital (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Myhr, Terri L.
  • Loutfy, Mona R.
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2008-12
Volume
35
Issue
12
Pages
973-978
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W142342431
Cited by
41
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
HIV post-exposure prophylaxis, sexual assault, adolescent girls, antiretroviral therapy, health professional counseling, anxiety, multicultural communities, Ontario
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Child, Counseling, Female, Humans, Ontario, Patient Compliance, Sex Offenses, Program Evaluation, HIV Infections, Anti-HIV Agents, Crime Victims, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review