Cited by 21Public Health Policies and EducationSmoking Behavior and CessationGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology

Successfully Maintaining Program Funding During Trying Times: Lessons From Tobacco Control Programs in Five States

Nelson, David E., Reynolds, Jennifer H., Luke, Douglas A., Mueller, Nancy B., Eischen, Monica H., Jordan, Jerelyn, Lancaster, R. Brick, Marcus, Stephen E. +1 more·2007·Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

Abstract

In Brief Despite negative financial conditions in recent years, several states were able to successfully maintain funding for tobacco prevention and control, which provided an opportunity to understand the factors associated with success. One explanation may be the level of long-term program sustainability in some states. According to a model developed by Saint Louis University researchers, the five elements critical to tobacco control sustainability are state political and financial climate; community awareness and capacity; program structure and administration; funding stability and planning; and surveillance and evaluation. Five states (Nebraska, New York, Indiana, Virginia, and Colorado) maintained funding for their tobacco control programs. Four of these states gained additional legislative appropriations or prevented a massive reduction; Colorado used a statewide ballot initiative to increase funding. On the basis of the sustainability framework, case studies, and prior research, the major lessons learned for maintaining funding were the importance of (1) strong and experienced leadership, (2) broad and deep organizational and community ties, (3) coordinated efforts, (4) strategic use of surveillance and evaluation data, (5) active dissemination of information about program successes, and (6) policy maker champions. The sustainability framework and lessons learned may provide valuable insights for other public health programs facing funding threats. This article describes how, despite negative financial conditions in recent years, the five states of Nebraska, New York, Indiana, Virginia, and Colorado were able to successfully maintain funding for tobacco prevention and control, presenting an opportunity to understand the factors associated with success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.phh.0000296138.48929.45

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 10 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson, D. E., Reynolds, J. H., Luke, D. A., Mueller, N. B., Eischen, M. H., Jordan, J., Lancaster, R. B., Marcus, S. E., & Vallone, D.
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Truth Initiative (US)
Venue
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice
Published
2007-11
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
612-620
ISSN
1078-4659 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142625658
Cited by
21
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Public Health Management and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Keywords
tobacco control programs, program funding, sustainable funding, program leadership, community participation, legislative appropriations, ballot initiatives, economic recession, state health programs
MeSH terms
Smoking Prevention, Community-Institutional Relations, Government Programs, Health Education, Humans, Leadership, Politics, Smoking, State Government, United States, Sentinel Surveillance, Tobacco Products

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review