Cited by 9Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy Studies

Antidepressant-Induced Hypomania in Treatment-Resistant Depression

BADER, CYNTHIA D., DUNNER, DAVID L.·2007·Journal of Psychiatric Practice

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors propose that isolated treatment-associated hypomanic episodes in patients with chronic treatment-resistant major depressive disorder are not indicative of true bipolar depression. This proposal is in contrast to most studies that support the notion that antidepressant-induced hypomania reflects an underlying bipolar condition in such depressed patients. However, the patients described in the literature have not had treatment-resistant depression. METHOD: Records of 146 patients with treatment-resistant major depression seen at a university-based tertiary referral center were reviewed for evidence of treatment-associated mania or hypomania. Treatment histories, clinical characteristics, and family histories of these patients were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients, 16 patients had evidenced treatment-induced hypomania or hypomanic-like episodes. The number of antidepressant trials these patients had received ranged from 2 to 13. The hypomanic episodes did not occur with the first antidepressant treatment trial except in one patient. All of the 16 patients had antidepressant treatment trials subsequent to the trial during which they experienced hypomania, but only one of them experienced further episodes of hypomania. In addition, only 1 of the 16 patients had a family history of bipolar disorder, a rate of bipolar family history that is considerably less than we have found among bipolar patients. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept of antidepressant-induced hypomania presented in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, revised (DSM-IV-TR). However, we argue that this term should be restricted to patients with chronic treatment-resistant major depression who infrequently evidence mania or hypomania.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.pra.0000281483.11946.b5

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BADER, C. D., & DUNNER, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Practice
Published
2007-07
Volume
13
Issue
4
Pages
233-237
ISSN
  • 1527-4160 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-1145
OpenAlex
W2033106283
Cited by
9
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
Keywords
antidepressant-induced hypomania, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, bipolar depression, antidepressant-induced mania, family history of bipolar disorder, DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria, hypomanic episodes
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Chronic Disease, Major Depressive Disorder, Drug Resistance, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Washington, Retreatment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review